|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Sept 17, 2009 15:39:33 GMT -5
In DC I hear you gotta be....lol
|
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Sept 17, 2009 15:44:10 GMT -5
In DC I hear you gotta be....lol  |
|
|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Sept 17, 2009 15:46:56 GMT -5
In DC I hear you gotta be....lol So are you sayin that the Bruhz are on the DL?  ?  |
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Sept 17, 2009 15:53:17 GMT -5
You gotta be selective in Atlanta too Negus. Unless you're up for some DL loving. So are you sayin that the Bruhz are on the DL? ? 
Why are you fighting the Coleman in you? Why? |
|
|
|
Post by ReignMan19 on Sept 17, 2009 16:03:51 GMT -5
uh what??
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Sept 17, 2009 16:07:11 GMT -5
So are you sayin that the Bruhz are on the DL? ?
Why are you fighting the Coleman in you? Why? I'm not fighting the Coleman in me, I was just clarifying your comments on where it may have previously been...LOL |
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Sept 17, 2009 16:10:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Sept 17, 2009 16:24:38 GMT -5
1/31/10. THAT's our date. You may need to come South though. It's a little hairy up there that time of the year. I'm delicate.....LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Oldskool on Sept 17, 2009 19:02:48 GMT -5
I don't care how long this thread stays open, the answer is still NOPE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cambist on Sept 18, 2009 11:09:54 GMT -5
....and unless you marry a 12 year old from Amish Pennsylvania... ......single. |
|
|
|
Post by Comedy on Sept 28, 2009 15:34:41 GMT -5
There is no such thing as "formerly gay." If you have every visited the wild side you are gay don't attempt to trick yourself.
|
|
Serenity
OOA pledge
[C01:9900CC]
Posts: 158
|
Post by Serenity on Sept 28, 2009 20:46:25 GMT -5
^ I'm inclined to agree and would not date a "formerly gay" man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oren Ishii on Sept 28, 2009 21:01:51 GMT -5
I think this question will always be answered differently by women & men, and rightfully so.
The way we view gender roles in this society makes it so.
A man who engages in a homosexual act, in the eyes of most of the community, has emasculated himself...he is no longer the same. He's given up a part of his manhood.
Men like to indulge their own fantasies, so a woman who engages in such an act is accepted, and thought to be "experimenting" (this annoys the h_ell out of me).
Not to mention, most believe that there's a higher possibility of health risks among men in homosexual relationships than women.
It's a double standard, yes; but, it's just "the way it is."
|
|
|
|
Post by LogAKAlly <3'n Keef on Sept 28, 2009 21:21:11 GMT -5
I think this question will always be answered differently by women & men, and rightfully so. The way we view gender roles in this society makes it so.
A man who engages in a homosexual act, in the eyes of most of the community, has emasculated himself...he is no longer the same. He's given up a part of his manhood.Men like to indulge their own fantasies, so a woman who engages in such an act is accepted, and thought to be "experimenting" (this annoys the h_ell out of me). Not to mention, most believe that there's a higher possibility of health risks among men in homosexual relationships than women. It's a double standard, yes; but, it's just "the way it is." I've been saying that for years!! When 2 women lay down, they can both get back up and walk away - two "women" in terms on gender roles. When 2 men lay down, - somebody is coming up dominated.  |
|
Serenity
OOA pledge
[C01:9900CC]
Posts: 158
|
Post by Serenity on Sept 28, 2009 22:02:57 GMT -5
When 2 men lay down, - somebody is coming up dominated. I caught myself chuckling at this one, but it is true. |
|
|
|
Post by Cambist on Sept 29, 2009 8:36:35 GMT -5
I think we need some operational definitions here......
|
|
|
|
Post by Comedy on Sept 29, 2009 8:42:29 GMT -5
Operational Definition of Gay: Man on man sex, woman on woman sex. As a woman you cannot not eat cooch wake up and say that you are straight. I wouldn't eat cooch to help God save the Earth! I don't understand how women think it's okay to make out with another woman for the sake of turning a man on...b4tch you are if you are reading this. There is not double standard for males or females if you do it you're the gutts and that's it. I think we need some operational definitions here...... |
|
|
|
Post by Coldfront06 on Sept 29, 2009 9:01:53 GMT -5
Leave it to Comedy to tell it like it is...LOL!
|
|
|
|
Post by godfirstmelast on Jun 3, 2010 23:54:25 GMT -5
The answer I want to give is that I wouldn't care. The truth is that I would probably run as fast as I can in the other direction. Sucks that that's what it is, but, there are some things I just can't get with. Case in point: A guy who I knew was gay in highschool approached me in college and asked to hang out. Me, thinking it was on a friendship basis only, said sure, why not? Let's go get something to eat. So we wound up going to iHop, and I was all confused that he asked to pay for the bill. But I let it go. Throughout the dinner, I listen to him tell me all about his life and his past relationships, and wondered why he felt the need to run down his life with me, especially since I knew he was banging ninjas. The funniest part of the night happened when I went to the bathroom, came back, and he was full on in conversation with a flamboyant gay man. The man was clearly hitting on him. He was clearly trying to ignore the fact that the man was hitting on him. I sit down, and the man continues to chat it up with him, over my head (the guy is sitting in the booth behind us). Convo went like this: Gay guy: "Oh, is that your sister?" Me:" No, we're just friends, eating out." Him: "Yea, and we're kind of busy, so..," Gay guy, cutting him off: "So you're from around here? (talking to him)" Him: "Uh, no, I live in _____." GG: "Oh, really? I have a bunch of friends that live out there. Maybe we should all hang out sometime?" *guy crosses his legs, leans forward and bats his eyelashes* This went on for a while, until the waitress brought the gay guy his check and he left. Later on my friend tried to tell me some sh!t about he was saved and moved past that era in his life when I called him out on his gayness. Yet, the homies is still hitting on you? Come on, now. Gaydar ain't no joke, according to some of my gay friends, and clearly Mr. Flirtateous saw something in you that you were trying your best to hide from me and from yourself. |
|
G Money$CMB$
OOA neo
?It's not the load that breaks you down, it's the way you carry it.?
Posts: 264
|
Post by G Money$CMB$ on Jun 4, 2010 15:14:28 GMT -5
Would I date a "formally" gay person? Absolutely Not.
Why? Because I feel as though these emotions never "dissappear" or "end". You either act on the emotions OR surpress them. Case in point Donnie McClurkin. Donnie claims to be "delivered" from homosexuality. Could God have delivered him from this "urge" to have some sort of "relations" with a man? Maybe.
|
|
sista
OOA Interest
Posts: 80
|
Post by sista on Aug 17, 2010 23:37:44 GMT -5
I would run the other way... DITTO!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by peppermint on Aug 20, 2010 8:38:04 GMT -5
So then does anyone believe that a person can be "delivered" from promiscuity?
|
|
|
|
Post by LejaOMG on Aug 20, 2010 8:46:39 GMT -5
see...I liken the two concepts, Pep. Except that promiscuity is a behavior--something one can stop doing. Homosexuality encompasses so much more than that.
Susie is a heterosexual. That is, she desires physical intimacy with men and has engaged in such in the past. At the moment, Susie is not actively engaging in such. She has been delivered by God perhaps in the sense that she is able to exercise self-control, she has learned to "hate what is bad," she has improved her association, etc. But her tendency, her disposition to be intimate with a man exists. She may be suppressing it (even quite well) for religious reasons, but her heterosexual nature hasn't gone anywhere. Same for Donnie. He may not currently be screwing men. He may banish the thought. But his nature is the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by peppermint on Aug 20, 2010 10:28:44 GMT -5
^^^ But does lust not begin in the mind? Isn't Susie's ongoing desire to be with multiple men, even if she isn't acting on it still lustful?
|
|
|
|
Post by LejaOMG on Aug 20, 2010 11:08:00 GMT -5
even if its a desire to be with just one man, the lust begins in the mind. You're exactly right. Even if she's been "delivered" from feeling the need to act on her lust, the lust is still present (if occassionally). To answer the question in the thread title, I don't believe there's any such thing. A man may not be acting out the homosexual "lust," and he may even being controlling the lust itself fairly well, but I don't feel that he'll ever be immune to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by peppermint on Aug 20, 2010 16:54:47 GMT -5
How does that differ from someone who sleeps around though? At the beginning of this thread I said "no." Not saying I would not, but I'm trying to figure out how this is truly different from someone who has a past of bed hopping.
|
|
|
|
Post by godfirstmelast on Aug 26, 2010 10:13:57 GMT -5
peppermint A guy who slept around with a lot of women is not the same as a guy who slept with a few men. thats a whole different gender. the bible says promiscuity and homosexuality are both sins, but homosexuality is an abomination....
|
|
|
|
Post by LejaOMG on Aug 26, 2010 11:33:46 GMT -5
^^ so is fornication. Very same scripture.
|
|
|
|
Post by godfirstmelast on Aug 26, 2010 13:23:14 GMT -5
^^^^ can you tell me the passage? im looking at leviticus 18 and all i see is the homo bit...
|
|
|
|
Post by LejaOMG on Aug 26, 2010 14:18:29 GMT -5
1 Corinthians 6:9,10
|
|
