|
Post by DamieQue™ on Aug 3, 2010 16:10:18 GMT -5
Here are some insights into the Teabagger movement from someone from the Republican party - he is essentially an example of them eating their own. He is saying what we always knew... and is clearly visible to any objective observer.
For my political junkies this is a MUST read. It shows you how irrational these folks are. motherjones.com/politics/2010/08/bob-inglis-tea-party-casualty?page=1
|
|
|
Post by Robelite on Aug 3, 2010 22:42:34 GMT -5
"In the weeks since, Inglis has criticized Republican House leaders for acquiescing to a poisonous, tea party-driven "demagoguery" that he believes will undermine the GOP's long-term credibility. And he's freely recounting his frustrating interactions with tea party types, while noting that Republican leaders are pushing rhetoric tainted with racism, that conservative activists are dabbling in anti-Semitic conspiracy theory nonsense, and that Sarah Palin celebrates ignorance."
Just goes to show that there are some on ther right who still have their intelligence and sense of objectivity in tact. The enlarged part of that quote from the article says it all. She celebrates it, and her loyal followers walk in lockstep right behind her!
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Aug 4, 2010 6:49:50 GMT -5
I wish blacks in the 60's could have seen what the Democratic Party had done to them. But ignorance is bliss, and it is usually the poor and ignorant that suffer. By the way, the DEMS haven't changed, and this two-party system is becoming more like one as time moves on, which will be a dangerous thing. I do not look at things from a two-party perspective, I look at the worldviews of the candidates, and the incumbents. This is where you will see the "whole curx of the matter".
And you think DEMS are not anti-semitic? Are you all blind? I thought I was really dealing with intelligent people willing to look at a situation from the whole perspective.
|
|
|
Post by Robelite on Aug 4, 2010 12:27:17 GMT -5
Tell us denny, just what is it that the repubs/tea-baggers/birthers/deathers/just-plain idiots are doing for you? And please, try to keep it to a simple response (one or two sentences, three at the most.) That "trick" you do of responding with paragraphs and paragraphs of mindless rantings (to cover for your non-answers) has gotten tired as well.
If you can't respond simply and quickly, save all that "other," please.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Aug 4, 2010 12:48:22 GMT -5
I wish blacks in the 60's could have seen what the Democratic Party had done to them. But ignorance is bliss, and it is usually the poor and ignorant that suffer. By the way, the DEMS haven't changed, and this two-party system is becoming more like one as time moves on, which will be a dangerous thing. I do not look at things from a two-party perspective, I look at the worldviews of the candidates, and the incumbents. This is where you will see the "whole curx of the matter". And you think DEMS are not anti-semitic? Are you all blind? I thought I was really dealing with intelligent people willing to look at a situation from the whole perspective. All due respect,
What does anything you just said have to do with the link? Did you read it? Again, it's not a Democrat talking about the insanity to which the Republican party has succumbed, it's a recount from a dyed in the wool Republican, a standard bearer for the party who, armed only with logical and reason, was completely without remedy to reach his current constitutents.
For goodness sake even YOU haven't made some of the allegations that they made in that article... this is not a smear campaign for them, these are sincerely held beliefs of pure unadulterated ignorance and know-nothing-ism. They are a national movement for the celebration of psychological projection, paranoia, and stupidity - and they want to elect people LIKE themselves.
Even YOU can't seriously say that you identify with these folks or having any truck with them.
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Aug 4, 2010 15:56:23 GMT -5
He hit the nail on the head when he said Sarah Palin encourages stupidity.
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Aug 5, 2010 6:16:04 GMT -5
I wish blacks in the 60's could have seen what the Democratic Party had done to them. But ignorance is bliss, and it is usually the poor and ignorant that suffer. By the way, the DEMS haven't changed, and this two-party system is becoming more like one as time moves on, which will be a dangerous thing. I do not look at things from a two-party perspective, I look at the worldviews of the candidates, and the incumbents. This is where you will see the "whole curx of the matter". And you think DEMS are not anti-semitic? Are you all blind? I thought I was really dealing with intelligent people willing to look at a situation from the whole perspective. All due respect,
What does anything you just said have to do with the link? Did you read it? Again, it's not a Democrat talking about the insanity to which the Republican party has succumbed, it's a recount from a dyed in the wool Republican, a standard bearer for the party who, armed only with logical and reason, was completely without remedy to reach his current constitutents.
For goodness sake even YOU haven't made some of the allegations that they made in that article... this is not a smear campaign for them, these are sincerely held beliefs of pure unadulterated ignorance and know-nothing-ism. They are a national movement for the celebration of psychological projection, paranoia, and stupidity - and they want to elect people LIKE themselves.
Even YOU can't seriously say that you identify with these folks or having any truck with them. And YOU can have nothing to do with individuals who have already proven themsleves as murderers from abortion to now wanting to take this a step further, as quoted in the special brand of crazy I. If you honestly believe that democrats do not have deep-seated convictions against blacks, then their cleverly disguised and hidden agendas have worked. As I said, I think this 13th amendment thing is crazy, but what I posted is even more crazy than that. It's not always about what's happening now, but what is to eventually come down the road. Things like Agenda 21, the Sustainabilty movement, school-to-work programs, the DIVERSITY Agenda, Active Euthanasia, etc. I have always made a statement called the logical progression of things. Basically, when relative morals are involved, nothing evil/immoral is off the table. As I stated, the agenda is to approach a happy medium between DEMS and REPUBS, so that they are one in heart, but only separate by party line. What will this mean? You vote one out to vote the other in, and you have no virtual change. Specter jumped the isle, but he hasn't changed. He was a RINO anyway. I have seen a major aganeda against Christianity by almost ALL conservative show hosts I know. Although I agree with much of what they say, I have problems with how they portray Christianity as well as other faiths. When I say against, I mean, they want to mold all faiths under the same umbrella. Beck has hoodwinked many Pastors, or these Pastors have just saw fit to compromise for some face time. I personally warned a pastor from Texas running for congress to confront Beck about his Mormonism. Pastor Broden is his name. This goverment we have in charge now is the continuing antithesis of how it is supposed to be. We were founded as a Republic, but few people are even aware of that these days. You harldy ever see the word Free Enterprise in textbooks. They use that dirty old word called Capitalism. I am neither a (R) or (D). Being unaffiliated has been just fine for me. I have no heartstrings to tug on. I have called Repubs and Dems offices to see where they stood on certain issues that are improtant to me. If I do not like what I here, they don't get my vote, and that's plain and simple politics for me. When someone here can find out what the Rice Cup is, how it came about, and who controlled this plot, you may never see the (R) or (D) the same. At the same time Nixon (R) was in agreement with the "little black bastards" being aborted, the (D) leadership was doing unconscionable things to blacks, abortion included. When I say (D) leadership, I mean men who were in control of almost if not ALL of the committees in the Congress and Senate (i.e. they controlled where the money did and did not go). This is why I am unaffiliated with parties. It's all about the Biblical Worldview. Robe gets on me about Jesse Helms, but never mentioned on word about the Late Robert Byrd. He may have left the Klan, but he still showed that he hated blacks when he got elected. When he used the term white "niggers", it would only suffice in his mind that there are some black ones too. M2Cents
|
|
|
Post by Robelite on Aug 5, 2010 17:59:14 GMT -5
You did what you do best, denny....post a lot of NOTHING to cover up for not having an answer to questions asked of you. Damie asked you a simple question. I admonished you earlier to post a SIMPLE response to my question and save all that mess you posted above. You failed TWO times!!
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Aug 7, 2010 18:48:26 GMT -5
You did what you do best, denny....post a lot of NOTHING to cover up for not having an answer to questions asked of you. Damie asked you a simple question. I admonished you earlier to post a SIMPLE response to my question and save all that mess you posted above. You failed TWO times!! I don't have to answer your questions, as you do not have to answer mine. I know who and what I am dealing with here, especially from you two guys. So I pick my battles and say what I choose to say. If this Inglis guy doesn't have the guts to call Obama out for who and what he is beside the President, I would call him into question as to what his worldview is, period. And by the way, all that stuff up there is not for you, as I know you wish to remain ignorant about the facts of the party you worship.
|
|