|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Jun 1, 2010 15:38:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Coach on Jun 2, 2010 12:01:18 GMT -5
When it all said and done with....he might go down as the most dominating athlete ever. Possibly....
|
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Jun 2, 2010 12:13:07 GMT -5
For an individual sport? I might agree. I would have put Tiger up that but he's been faltering lately.
|
|
|
|
Post by Coach on Jun 2, 2010 12:27:45 GMT -5
Well yea. Tiger would be in that conversation also...
I find it difficult to argue the most dominating athlete on a team oriented sport.
|
|
|
|
Post by Coldfront06 on Jun 3, 2010 16:26:54 GMT -5
This is an interesting conversation: Many consider Federer to be the best tennis player ever, and some say the most dominating individual athlete ever, but he has a losing record head to head against Nadal (who's probably about to take over the #1 spot in tennis). I think Nadal has like a 13-7 edge against Federer head to head. If Federer is the best tennis player ever, what does that say about Nadal?
|
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Jun 3, 2010 16:36:20 GMT -5
This is an interesting conversation: Many consider Federer to be the best tennis player ever, and some say the most dominating individual athlete ever, but he has a losing record head to head against Nadal (who's probably about to take over the #1 spot in tennis). I think Nadal has like a 13-7 edge against Federer head to head. If Federer is the best tennis player ever, what does that say about Nadal? |
|
