|
|
Post by denounced on Aug 25, 2009 9:22:44 GMT -5
Now, onto other things, THE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS PLATFORM IS A LIE. Obama needs to be or is already well informed that this is a big fat lie. I read the language of the bill. Oh, it's crafty. You have to do referencing, look at other policies, and then find the new sections of the other references, because the existing bill references the outdated ones. Now did that just give you a headache?
I started at page one and got to page 21 to find this out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cambist on Aug 25, 2009 10:05:37 GMT -5
What do you mean, denounced? Are you saying that those with pre-existing conditions still wont be covered?
|
|
|
|
Post by No Screen Name on Aug 25, 2009 13:53:25 GMT -5
I wish he wouldn't come in here with PARTIAL information all the time. Now, if this is true, I DO NOT support this, no matter how much I love Obama. But Denounced hasn't provided us with anything: which bill he read (I hear there are five proposals), a link, a paragraph, any specific information.
Denounced--if you come back and read this, PLEASE bring more information. I want to know more about this. If there is no provision for pre-existing conditions, the whole thing is GARBAGE IMHO.
|
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Aug 28, 2009 13:41:29 GMT -5
No! Go read the bill for yourself. That way you will know for yourself.
No cam, i am not saying that, what i am saying is that Obama brngs it to the table like they will be covered, carte blanche (I hope that's right). Some may have them waived, some may not. The bill places it in the hands of the policy writers......
Section that says, prohibiting pre-existing conditions exclusions
|
|
