|
|
Post by huey on Jul 14, 2009 10:05:22 GMT -5
Was Jesus real? Should it matter?
There are disputes on whether or not Jesus of Nazareth actually existed.
Should it matter?
Was Moses real? Should it matter?
There are disputes on whether or not Moses actually existed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 14, 2009 10:39:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Jul 22, 2009 14:33:20 GMT -5
These disputes should have been raised during the early years, but there were none. That's where the real evidence for such things should be found. By the way Vudu, I will be at your almamater in August for the second time. The first as a Que, now as an Ex-Que.
|
|
|
|
Post by peppermint on Jul 22, 2009 15:09:23 GMT -5
Partially true, except the Jesus I serve has resurrected. Jesus is more dependable than man so why not show love to the One who sacrificed His all? |
|
|
|
Post by Mrs. Eyes on Jul 22, 2009 15:59:26 GMT -5
What happened to the Black men who stopped loving their black women and degrading them? I might as well love a man who dies for my sins, whether He looks white, black, or red with green polka-dots. |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 23, 2009 6:08:13 GMT -5
What happened to the Black men who stopped loving their black women and degrading them? I might as well love a man who dies for my sins, whether He looks white, black, or red with green polka-dots. Stop being scorned on some victim chit and get on your magic Queen. Learn who you are and you won't have those problems. You are who you pick... Change your vibration.... |
|
|
|
Post by peppermint on Jul 23, 2009 9:35:41 GMT -5
^^^I disagree with this to an extent. You can only control your actions, not those of someone else. There are very ppl who show their behinds in the beginning of a relationship. I do think sometimes there is a tendency to punish people in the present for mistakes others have made in the past, but such is life. At some point the person committing the offense should be held to the same standard as the victim. Why is it okay for the degration of women within our community to continue? Why is it that the women need to change while it is perfectly acceptable for a man to remain the same? To receive love, you have to know how to give it. The black man should stop being scorned and check his vibration
|
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 23, 2009 9:55:44 GMT -5
^^^I disagree with this to an extent. You can only control your actions, not those of someone else. There are very ppl who show their behinds in the beginning of a relationship. I do think sometimes there is a tendency to punish people in the present for mistakes others have made in the past, but such is life. At some point the person committing the offense should be held to the same standard as the victim. Why is it okay for the degration of women within our community to continue? Why is it that the women need to change while it is perfectly acceptable for a man to remain the same? To receive love, you have to know how to give it. The black man should stop being scorned and check his vibration How you gonna blame the actions of a person who you CHOOSE to be with? My fault the devil made you do it huh? Smdh... Oh and please save the degradation of women jazz in our communities for someone else. Women are degraded daily in this entire society. Don't clown the community and say nothing about network television and marketing. Thats like getting upset with someone who driving slow but saying nothing about the terrible road conditions and rubber necking going on from an accident that bogs the entire traffic down. Name a female Angel. How about this.. How can Lot have the lords men in his house when the fags from Sodom came to rape them and this muthafucka offered his own damn daughters who were Virgins to them to protect these Men who stayed in his house? Genesis 19:3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. 4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. 5 They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them." 6 Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him 7 and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing. 8 Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don't do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof." BULLCHIT! Please stop. |
|
|
|
Post by huey on Jul 23, 2009 10:00:03 GMT -5
^^^I disagree with this to an extent. You can only control your actions, not those of someone else. There are very ppl who show their behinds in the beginning of a relationship. I do think sometimes there is a tendency to punish people in the present for mistakes others have made in the past, but such is life. At some point the person committing the offense should be held to the same standard as the victim. Why is it okay for the degration of women within our community to continue? Why is it that the women need to change while it is perfectly acceptable for a man to remain the same? To receive love, you have to know how to give it. The black man should stop being scorned and check his vibration How you gonna blame the actions of a person who you CHOOSE to be with? My fault the devil made you do it huh? Smdh... Oh and please save the degradation of women jazz in our communities for someone else. Women are degraded daily in this entire society. Don't clown the community and say nothing about network television and marketing. Thats like getting upset with someone who driving slow but saying nothing about the terrible road conditions and rubber necking going on from an accident that bogs the entire traffic down. Name a female Angel. How about this.. How can Lot have the lords men in his house when the fags from Sodom came to rape them and this muthafucka offered his own damn daughters who were Virgins to them to protect these Men who stayed in his house? Genesis 19:3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. 4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. 5 They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them." 6 Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him 7 and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing. 8 Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don't do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof." BULLCHIT! Please stop. wtf i have never read the Bible. What kind of homo eroticism is this. |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 23, 2009 10:23:35 GMT -5
How you gonna blame the actions of a person who you CHOOSE to be with? My fault the devil made you do it huh? Smdh... Oh and please save the degradation of women jazz in our communities for someone else. Women are degraded daily in this entire society. Don't clown the community and say nothing about network television and marketing. Thats like getting upset with someone who driving slow but saying nothing about the terrible road conditions and rubber necking going on from an accident that bogs the entire traffic down. Name a female Angel. How about this.. How can Lot have the lords men in his house when the fags from Sodom came to rape them and this muthafucka offered his own damn daughters who were Virgins to them to protect these Men who stayed in his house? Genesis 19:3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. 4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. 5 They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them." 6 Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him 7 and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing. 8 Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don't do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof." BULLCHIT! Please stop. wtf i have never read the Bible. What kind of homo eroticism is this. Yeah that was the NIV version here is the KJV version of the same verse.
Genesis 19:5And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them. 6And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him, 7And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly. 8Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.
Genesis 4:1And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.Yeah so its obvious that in the KJV knew known when it comes to men and women or in the case of Sodom men and men it is akin to sexual relations. All I'm saying is folk can't talk about rappers when Abraham per the story set his own wife out for some cows and other chit to the Pharaoh. fuck on with this bs. |
|
|
|
Post by Mrs. Eyes on Jul 23, 2009 12:04:21 GMT -5
What happened to the Black men who stopped loving their black women and degrading them? I might as well love a man who dies for my sins, whether He looks white, black, or red with green polka-dots. Stop being scorned on some victim chit and get on your magic Queen. Learn who you are and you won't have those problems. You are who you pick... Change your vibration.... Who said I was scorned or a victim? LMAO! Seriously.........I know who I am VP. You love to pick a fight for no good reason I see.................... |
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Jul 23, 2009 12:34:09 GMT -5
Was Jesus real? Should it matter? There are disputes on whether or not Jesus of Nazareth actually existed. Should it matter? Was Moses real? Should it matter? There are disputes on whether or not Moses actually existed. |
|
|
|
Post by Mrs. Eyes on Jul 23, 2009 12:45:57 GMT -5
Was Jesus real? Should it matter? There are disputes on whether or not Jesus of Nazareth actually existed. Should it matter? Was Moses real? Should it matter? There are disputes on whether or not Moses actually existed. No sarcasm intended but................................that's a damn good question. |
|
|
|
Post by huey on Jul 23, 2009 13:05:05 GMT -5
Was Jesus real? Should it matter? There are disputes on whether or not Jesus of Nazareth actually existed. Should it matter? Was Moses real? Should it matter? There are disputes on whether or not Moses actually existed. Yes it would matter. If the Quran is to be the "word of God" as given to Muhammad through angel Gabriel and Jesus is not real, then how do we account for Jesus being in the Quran. Or as u said the Muslim belief in Jesus. |
|
|
|
Post by LejaOMG on Jul 23, 2009 13:32:54 GMT -5
Real talk. That dude Gabriel sure did get around
|
|
|
|
Post by huey on Jul 23, 2009 14:02:16 GMT -5
I know, he was doing his thing.
He been MIA for past thousand years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 23, 2009 14:08:07 GMT -5
Does not the Muslim faith teach that Jesus was a prophet in a long line of prophets of which Muhammad was the last? If that's so it seems to me if Jesus doesn't exist, then there is no line of prophets from which Muhammad can emerge as the final law bringer. I don't personally believe that Jesus was merely a prophet, or a prophet among prophets as suggested, but I guess my question to you is - wouldn't it matter to YOU if He never existed? Yes it would matter. If the Quran is to be the "word of God" as given to Muhammad through angel Gabriel and Jesus is not real, then how do we account for Jesus being in the Quran. Or as u said the Muslim belief in Jesus. damn... that was a good question team. I use this angle all the time when Muslims try to separate themselves from Christianity when they can't. Gabriel or as Islam calls him Jebril came to Mary as in concern to Jesus. Gabriel also came to Moses as well. The reason that you find Asa (Jesus) in the Quran is that some believe the text was written by the same folks(or inspired by) who wrote the New Testament. Something I use to look at back in the day when I was doing heavy reading. Gabriel comes to Moses in the burning Bush but then it says its the Lord. First it says the Angel of the Lord who is Gabriel then its says the lord. Then Gabriel also comes to Mary. Gabriel lastly comes to Muhammad. Now when I read the book of Enoch which the movie The Prophecy were based on... In Enoch Gabriel characteristics raise many questions. #1 The Book of Enoch states that Gabriel has dominion over all Serpents. #2 Gabriel is commissioned to kill all the children of the Watchers and those who he couldn't kill he was to go amongst them and pit them one against the other so that they may kill themselves.
Enoch 20:1. And these are the names of the holy angels who watch. 2. Uriel, one of the holy angels, who is over the world and over Tartarus. 3. Raphael, one of the holy angels, who is over the spirits of men. 4. Raguel, one of the holy angels who †takes vengeance on†the world of the luminaries. 5. Michael, one of the holy angels, to wit, he that is set over the best part of mankind ⌈⌈and⌉⌉ over chaos. 6. Saraqâêl, one of the holy angels, who is set over the spirits, who sin in the spirit. 7. Gabriel, one of the holy angels, who is over Paradise and the serpents and the Cherubim. 8. Remiel, one of the holy angels, whom God set over those who rise.
Enoch 10:9. And to Gabriel said the Lord: 'Proceed against the bastards and the reprobates, and against the children of fornication: and destroy [the children of fornication and] the children of the Watchers from amongst men [and cause them to go forth]: send them one against the other that they may destroy each other in battle: for length of days shall they not have. 10. And no request that they (i.e. their fathers) make of thee shall be granted unto their fathers on their behalf; for they hope to live an eternal life, and that each one of them will live five hundred years.'
Did Gabriel carry out his job per the story with Religion? Interesting to also note that both Daniel and Ezekiel are fallen Angels in the book of Enoch. |
|
|
|
Post by Mrs. Eyes on Jul 23, 2009 14:12:50 GMT -5
^ Nice VP.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 24, 2009 0:19:33 GMT -5
These disputes should have been raised during the early years, but there were none. That's where the real evidence for such things should be found. By the way Vudu, I will be at your almamater in August for the second time. The first as a Que, now as an Ex-Que. Bullchit... Arius black man from Libya stated that Jesus was a created entity and was not divine nor did he exist. This fact alone and its spread is what made Constantine call for the Council of Nicaea. Basically to debunk Arius and his teachings. Afterwards CONstantine ordered all of Arius works burned. This is why the first Pope was Black after the council. Done only to reaffirm the falsehood. Arius knew Jesus was nobody but Serapis a made up consecrated deity by sell out Priest in Kemet for Ptolemy I. Wake up dude you still sleeping. Jesus doesn't even exist in your dreams. I mean how is it a Man walked on Water, feed 1,000 with 2 fish and not one monument exist for him during his time. lol. Just folks "writing" about this fictitious person. |
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Jul 27, 2009 15:29:25 GMT -5
1.) The Angel of the Lord is not Gabriel.
2.) Constantine had no need to call for a Council of Nicea. All real decisions were made 200 years before this meeting ever occurred.
3.) The Early church fathers affirmed/confirmed/declared the Deity of Jesus. His being a created, non-deity is a farce.
4.) The Greatest of all monuments exist for Him. An empty tomb, the fact that crucifixion occurred during His time, The Word of God, and most of all, every Bron Again believer. Jesus predicted the destruction of the only monument that existed for God, His Holy Temple. We are His temples in the earth, his monuments so to speak, and it was through His Temple that we can have eternal life and a relationship with God.
5.) This Arius you speak of, you mean the author of the ARIAN HERESY that Jesus is not God, whose doctrine was unanimously ovverruled to the tune of 99+ percent? Funny how Christ's Deity took about 200 years to be challenged. That's the normal amount of time it takes before myths start to form. Fortunately, in the providence of God, those 200 years are too well documented to be disputed. *** Notice I said, during the EARLY years, not 200 years later***
Foul Language and hostility are fanfare for weak, baseless arguments. They get you cheers and high fives, while people go home with messed minds, still blind.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 27, 2009 16:15:39 GMT -5
1.) The Angel of the Lord is not Gabriel. 2.) Constantine had no need to call for a Council of Nicea. All real decisions were made 200 years before this meeting ever occurred. 3.) The Early church fathers affirmed/confirmed/declared the Deity of Jesus. His being a created, non-deity is a farce. 4.) The Greatest of all monuments exist for Him. An empty tomb, the fact that crucifixion occurred during His time, The Word of God, and most of all, every Bron Again believer. Jesus predicted the destruction of the only monument that existed for God, His Holy Temple. We are His temples in the earth, his monuments so to speak, and it was through His Temple that we can have eternal life and a relationship with God. 5.) This Arius you speak of, you mean the author of the ARIAN HERESY that Jesus is not God, whose doctrine was unanimously ovverruled to the tune of 99+ percent? Funny how Christ's Deity took about 200 years to be challenged. That's the normal amount of time it takes before myths start to form. Fortunately, in the providence of God, those 200 years are too well documented to be disputed. *** Notice I said, during the EARLY years, not 200 years later*** Foul Language and hostility are fanfare for weak, baseless arguments. They get you cheers and high fives, while people go home with messed minds, still blind. Denounced you might as well denounce your heritage as well. Early Church fathers? I have questions then..\ #1 Who did your god send to speak with Daniel, Mary, Joseph, and St John the Devine? Who is giving directives to the men in Ezekiel as in concern to the Mother Wheel? #2 If CONstatine had no need for the council then why create the Nicean Creed? Why burn Arius works? #3 Who are these Early Church Fathers? Were they indeed pedophilian faggots? #4 Where is this empty tomb? Why not use an empty tomb as the motif for Christianity a sign for life instead of the cross a sign of death? I mean your lord is now alive right? or do you have faith he is? lol #5 Lastly show a work written about Jesus before 70CE. |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Jul 27, 2009 23:33:26 GMT -5
Your number 4 clearly shows you have no understanding of Christianity, not even the basics. I often find it interesting that others can let you believe what you believe but you come at others who believe differently. You could be looking for good conversation or debate, but that is highly plausible IMO. Oh well, do you cause I'm surely not going to debate my belief.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 28, 2009 1:58:48 GMT -5
Your number 4 clearly shows you have no understanding of Christianity, not even the basics. I often find it interesting that others can let you believe what you believe but you come at others who believe differently. You could be looking for good conversation or debate, but that is highly plausible IMO. Oh well, do you cause I'm surely not going to debate my belief. Your knowledge as in concern to this subject is limited. A lesson in life... the truth needs no chaser. You drank the truth straight. Lets have a recap here. 1. Proved Eve never died in the Bible. 2. Proved Ezekiel is the only person in the bible given the title Son of Man by your "God" 3. Proved Solomon is NOT the lily of the valley nor the rose of Sharon per biblical passages. 4. Proved that the Serpent told the truth on two occasions in Genesis. 5. Proved Jesus is NOT absolute. I can't even take you serious because you are a perennial cosigner. The irony is you cosign on falsehood. It's actually quite funny. The cold vein is I have a far deeper and clear understanding of Christianity than probably anyone on this board. Time and time again yall bump your gums and time and time again by myself I shut it down. 90% of the stuff I say you have NEVER heard of so how in the hayle can you dispute what I'm spitting? That denotes blind ignorance. If you haven't taken the time to research to prove me wrong then why talk? The BASICS of Christianity is Jesus died on the Cross and was resurrected, Not on a spiritual level not on a mental level on the Physical level. That means his sarcophagus should be EMPTY. Thing is where is it? Where is the Tomb of Jesus? Where is the linen he was wrapped in? The truth makes you uncomfortable. The truth of the matter is you have 4 Gospels you mean to tell me nobody had the where withall to have exactly where this dude was buried when he rose? I mean do you know the tourist attraction that would be? That chit would be like Mecca for Christians. But I don't understand the Basics? Teach me something then..... I'll wait lol |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Jul 28, 2009 12:04:54 GMT -5
Your number 4 clearly shows you have no understanding of Christianity, not even the basics. I often find it interesting that others can let you believe what you believe but you come at others who believe differently. You could be looking for good conversation or debate, but that is highly plausible IMO. Oh well, do you cause I'm surely not going to debate my belief. Your knowledge as in concern to this subject is limited. A lesson in life... the truth needs no chaser. You drank the truth straight. Lets have a recap here. 1. Proved Eve never died in the Bible. 2. Proved Ezekiel is the only person in the bible given the title Son of Man by your "God" 3. Proved Solomon is NOT the lily of the valley nor the rose of Sharon per biblical passages. 4. Proved that the Serpent told the truth on two occasions in Genesis. 5. Proved Jesus is NOT absolute. I can't even take you serious because you are a perennial cosigner. The irony is you cosign on falsehood. It's actually quite funny. The cold vein is I have a far deeper and clear understanding of Christianity than probably anyone on this board. Time and time again yall bump your gums and time and time again by myself I shut it down. 90% of the stuff I say you have NEVER heard of so how in the hayle can you dispute what I'm spitting? That denotes blind ignorance. If you haven't taken the time to research to prove me wrong then why talk? The BASICS of Christianity is Jesus died on the Cross and was resurrected, Not on a spiritual level not on a mental level on the Physical level. That means his sarcophagus should be EMPTY. Thing is where is it? Where is the Tomb of Jesus? Where is the linen he was wrapped in? The truth makes you uncomfortable. The truth of the matter is you have 4 Gospels you mean to tell me nobody had the where withall to have exactly where this dude was buried when he rose? I mean do you know the tourist attraction that would be? That chit would be like Mecca for Christians. But I don't understand the Basics? Teach me something then..... I'll wait lol It's funny how you thinkyou know about people on this board and you don't. As I stated in my last post, last sentence, "Oh well, do you cause I'm surely not going to debate my belief." That is why I don't go back and forth, fill the need to do this, that, and the third ,write a thesis about whatever to prove my point with you or anyone because ( get ready for it, this will blow you away) I don't have too, not because I don't know, but I don't have to prove my faith, belief, and religion to anyone. You don't know what I have and haven't heard because you aren't me. Call me a co-signer, uninformed, whatever, none of it bothers me ;D Not taking me serious doesn't bother me either, because I don't take you serious either when it comes to my religion so we are in one accord on that subject  As I said before, you continue to do you and I will continue to do me. |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 28, 2009 12:16:01 GMT -5
Your knowledge as in concern to this subject is limited. A lesson in life... the truth needs no chaser. You drank the truth straight. Lets have a recap here. 1. Proved Eve never died in the Bible. 2. Proved Ezekiel is the only person in the bible given the title Son of Man by your "God" 3. Proved Solomon is NOT the lily of the valley nor the rose of Sharon per biblical passages. 4. Proved that the Serpent told the truth on two occasions in Genesis. 5. Proved Jesus is NOT absolute. I can't even take you serious because you are a perennial cosigner. The irony is you cosign on falsehood. It's actually quite funny. The cold vein is I have a far deeper and clear understanding of Christianity than probably anyone on this board. Time and time again yall bump your gums and time and time again by myself I shut it down. 90% of the stuff I say you have NEVER heard of so how in the hayle can you dispute what I'm spitting? That denotes blind ignorance. If you haven't taken the time to research to prove me wrong then why talk? The BASICS of Christianity is Jesus died on the Cross and was resurrected, Not on a spiritual level not on a mental level on the Physical level. That means his sarcophagus should be EMPTY. Thing is where is it? Where is the Tomb of Jesus? Where is the linen he was wrapped in? The truth makes you uncomfortable. The truth of the matter is you have 4 Gospels you mean to tell me nobody had the where withall to have exactly where this dude was buried when he rose? I mean do you know the tourist attraction that would be? That chit would be like Mecca for Christians. But I don't understand the Basics? Teach me something then..... I'll wait lol It's funny how you thinkyou know about people on this board and you don't. As I stated in my last post, last sentence, "Oh well, do you cause I'm surely not going to debate my belief." That is why I don't go back and forth, fill the need to do this, that, and the third with you or anyone because I don't have too, not because I don't know, but I don't have to prove my faith, belief, and religion to anyone but the one who matters most. Call me a co-signer, uninformed, whatever, none of it bothers me ;D Not taking me serious doesn't bother me, because I don't take you serious either when it comes to my religion As I said before, you continue to do you and I will continue to do me. Then why type in the first place? What urged you to speak then? If you don't have to prove anything then why say anything? If you know about the subject why not interject what you know instead of cosigning on chit that is inexplicably dead wrong? One thing you could learn from me is when I speak on this board I only talk about chit I know. If I see post that I have no interest in or I'm uninformed about... I simply don't say anything. Since you are a chat voyeur don't watch the post I do comment on, watch the chit I don't comment on and I see every post on the board.... |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Jul 28, 2009 12:25:23 GMT -5
It's funny how you thinkyou know about people on this board and you don't. As I stated in my last post, last sentence, "Oh well, do you cause I'm surely not going to debate my belief." That is why I don't go back and forth, fill the need to do this, that, and the third with you or anyone because I don't have too, not because I don't know, but I don't have to prove my faith, belief, and religion to anyone but the one who matters most. Call me a co-signer, uninformed, whatever, none of it bothers me ;D Not taking me serious doesn't bother me, because I don't take you serious either when it comes to my religion As I said before, you continue to do you and I will continue to do me. Then why type in the first place? What urged you to speak then? If you don't have to prove anything then why say anything? If you know about the subject why not interject what you know instead of cosigning on chit that is inexplicably dead wrong? One thing you could learn from me is when I speak on this board I only talk about chit I know. If I see post that I have no interest in or I'm uninformed about... I simply don't say anything. Since you are a chat voyeur don't watch the post I do comment on, watch the chit I don't comment on and I see every post on the board.... : It's a message board, that is what you do. What urged you to speak then?: I saw something that explained to me that you don't know the basics of Christanity If you don't have to prove anything then why say anything?: You can interject on things you agree with on a message board with out giving a disseration. That is what it is for. If you know about the subject why not interject what you know instead of cosigning on chit that is inexplicably dead wrong?: It's dead wrong in your eyes, not mine, BIG difference. And in some subjects (as with religion to me) I don't have to prove what I know, especially on a message board unlike some people who seem to get a high arguing with folks about their beliefs. One thing you could learn from me is when I speak on this board I only talk about chit I know. If I see post that I have no interest in or I'm uninformed about... I simply don't say anything. Since you are a chat voyeur don't watch the post I do comment on, watch the chit I don't comment on and I see every post on the board: That is difference between you and me. As I said so many times before, you do you and I do me (i.e. you continue to attack people who don't agree with your philosophy and I will continue to comment where I see fit and how I see fit. (Key word here is "I"). Only thing that needs to be learned here, is respect each others differences, something that a lot of people have a huge problem with for whatever reason. I will pray for you  |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 28, 2009 13:10:04 GMT -5
Then why type in the first place? What urged you to speak then? If you don't have to prove anything then why say anything? If you know about the subject why not interject what you know instead of cosigning on chit that is inexplicably dead wrong? One thing you could learn from me is when I speak on this board I only talk about chit I know. If I see post that I have no interest in or I'm uninformed about... I simply don't say anything. Since you are a chat voyeur don't watch the post I do comment on, watch the chit I don't comment on and I see every post on the board.... : It's a message board, that is what you do. What urged you to speak then?: I saw something that explained to me that you don't know the basics of Christanity
If you don't have to prove anything then why say anything?: You can interject on things you agree with on a message board with out giving a disseration. That is what it is for. If you know about the subject why not interject what you know instead of cosigning on chit that is inexplicably dead wrong?: It's dead wrong in your eyes, not mine, BIG difference. And in some subjects (as with religion to me) I don't have to prove what I know, especially on a message board unlike some people who seem to get a high arguing with folks about their beliefs. One thing you could learn from me is when I speak on this board I only talk about chit I know. If I see post that I have no interest in or I'm uninformed about... I simply don't say anything. Since you are a chat voyeur don't watch the post I do comment on, watch the chit I don't comment on and I see every post on the board: That is difference between you and me. As I said so many times before, you do you and I do me (i.e. you continue to attack people who don't agree with your philosophy and I will continue to comment where I see fit and how I see fit. (Key word here is "I"). Only thing that needs to be learned here, is respect each others differences, something that a lot of people have a huge problem with for whatever reason. I will pray for you Who you gonna Pray to? So you interject even when you are uninformed? Interesting. See as former Pastor Ray Hagin stated and I paraphrase him... Our people have a tendency to have an emotional attachment to their imaginations when you step outside the circumference of their understanding. You stated I'm uniformed about the Basics of Christianity. I challenged your assertion and you refuse to provide analytical proof that would solidify your assessment. I'm still waiting for you to prove your point. I know you can't but trying is better than doing nothing. As you have seen my style is Rope A Dope... Meaning I style my arguments with Red Herring getting you to bite then knock you out. It's easy getting Christians to bite on falsehood.... if it were not you wouldn't be an adherent to the "faith" lol |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Jul 28, 2009 15:21:41 GMT -5
Then why type in the first place? : It's a message board, that is what you do. What urged you to speak then?: I saw something that explained to me that you don't know the basics of Christanity
If you don't have to prove anything then why say anything?: You can interject on things you agree with on a message board with out giving a disseration. That is what it is for. If you know about the subject why not interject what you know instead of cosigning on chit that is inexplicably dead wrong?: It's dead wrong in your eyes, not mine, BIG difference. And in some subjects (as with religion to me) I don't have to prove what I know, especially on a message board unlike some people who seem to get a high arguing with folks about their beliefs. One thing you could learn from me is when I speak on this board I only talk about chit I know. If I see post that I have no interest in or I'm uninformed about... I simply don't say anything. Since you are a chat voyeur don't watch the post I do comment on, watch the chit I don't comment on and I see every post on the board: That is difference between you and me. As I said so many times before, you do you and I do me (i.e. you continue to attack people who don't agree with your philosophy and I will continue to comment where I see fit and how I see fit. (Key word here is "I"). Only thing that needs to be learned here, is respect each others differences, something that a lot of people have a huge problem with for whatever reason. I will pray for you Who you gonna Pray to? So you interject even when you are uninformed? Interesting. See as former Pastor Ray Hagin stated and I paraphrase him... Our people have a tendency to have an emotional attachment to their imaginations when you step outside the circumference of their understanding. You stated I'm uniformed about the Basics of Christianity. I challenged your assertion and you refuse to provide analytical proof that would solidify your assessment. I'm still waiting for you to prove your point. I know you can't but trying is better than doing nothing. As you have seen my style is Rope A Dope... Meaning I style my arguments with Red Herring getting you to bite then knock you out. It's easy getting Christians to bite on falsehood.... if it were not you wouldn't be an adherent to the "faith" lol Womp, womp, womp. Out of everything I answered, you want to highlight where I said I don't think you understand Christanity out of all said just to once again, argue with someone who believes different from you (sigh). Don't need to prove to you that to me you don't understand the basics of Christanity because I said to me, you do not. I never said I interjected when I was uninformed, you did. I interject when I agree or disagree with something and just because I don't provide a book for why I do or don't agree doesn't mean I'm uninformed (I often feel like people who do do that, especially on a message board, have a complex where they are trying to make up for something that they are lacking. Hmmmmm.) For some reason, you don't understand that a person can have a different persepctive then you for themselves, key word here is themselves and don't have to prove it cause you asked them to. It is what it is, and you are still further proving that you don't understand Christanity, IMO. But you think you do so as I always say to you, hey, do you! And since you don't know who I'm praying to, that proves even more that I do in deed to pray for you (not falling for your combative agruments). You think you are ropping someone in and knocking them out to you (which is your right to think so, notice how I accepted that, didn't agree, but accepted it? wow!), but you are not, sorry hun, that is why I don't really pay you any mind. For someone who doesn't pay me any mind and say I'm baseless and whatever jibber jabber you said, you sure do like to continue to respond to me, I'm just saying  Oh well, moving on. |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 28, 2009 15:56:03 GMT -5
Who you gonna Pray to? So you interject even when you are uninformed? Interesting. See as former Pastor Ray Hagin stated and I paraphrase him... Our people have a tendency to have an emotional attachment to their imaginations when you step outside the circumference of their understanding. You stated I'm uniformed about the Basics of Christianity. I challenged your assertion and you refuse to provide analytical proof that would solidify your assessment. I'm still waiting for you to prove your point. I know you can't but trying is better than doing nothing. As you have seen my style is Rope A Dope... Meaning I style my arguments with Red Herring getting you to bite then knock you out. It's easy getting Christians to bite on falsehood.... if it were not you wouldn't be an adherent to the "faith" lol Womp, womp, womp. Out of everything I answered, you want to highlight where I said I don't think you understand Christanity out of all said just to once again, argue with someone who believes different from you (sigh). Don't need to prove to you that to me you don't understand the basics of Christanity because I said to me, you do not. I never said I interjected when I was uninformed, you did. I interject when I agree or disagree with something and just because I don't provide a book for why I do or don't agree doesn't mean I'm uninformed (I often feel like people who do do that, especially on a message board, have a complex where they are trying to make up for something that they are lacking. Hmmmmm.) For some reason, you don't understand that a person can have a different persepctive then you for themselves, key word here is themselves and don't have to prove it cause you asked them to. It is what it is, and you are still further proving that you don't understand Christanity, IMO. But you think you do so as I always say to you, hey, do you! And since you don't know who I'm praying to, that proves even more that I do in deed to pray for you (not falling for your combative agruments). You think you are ropping someone in and knocking them out to you (which is your right to think so, notice how I accepted that, didn't agree, but accepted it? wow!), but you are not, sorry hun, that is why I don't really pay you any mind. For someone who doesn't pay me any mind and say I'm baseless and whatever jibber jabber you said, you sure do like to continue to respond to me, I'm just saying Oh well, moving on. For the record I'm doing this for fun as you are woefully not on the level as in concern to this subject matter. You come where I stand in my circle and sistahs would eat you alive. Break you down something awful. Awful. It's amazing that you step out there then say all I'm looking at is the one thing you said. Well you made it the lynch pin of your argument. Lets Quote you directly. So how can I again take you seriously when you won't even stand by your own words. You said it clearly shows I have no understanding of the basics Christianity. You made one conscious thought and the rest was sensitive superlative as in concern to my delivery. What you want Vudu to do.. Woo you into believing the truth? Sugar is only used when something by itself taste like chit. I'm not your preacher. No shining and buck dancing and warm fuzzies here. Sorry See Vudu knows the most important holiday and affirmation of Jesus as the Christ in your religion is EASTER. What does EASTER signify? Resurrection. So why the hayle you wearing a cross? See VUDU knows the cross wasn't used until CONstatine came along and claimed who had a vision inside of the cross that stated "En Hawk Signo Wonka" Which meant In this Sign We shall Conquer. THIS is the reason why Christians started using the cross because of a vision from a non christian who used the religion as affirmation for the further spread of the deadly Roman Empire. You seriously need to wake up... if everybody is thinking the same thing... NOBODIES THINKING. |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 28, 2009 16:01:27 GMT -5
The Greek Version of CONstantine vision  Oh also the vision of CONstatine the cross was burning too... Hence the red cross symbolism. The KKK use to burn the cross as well as an ode to the vision of Constantine and salute the muthafucka.. In this Sign we shall conquer...... |
|
{=}http://s2.images.proboards.com/cool.gif{/=}
