|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Mar 31, 2009 16:22:41 GMT -5
The creation story in Genesis takes from 2 places. The primordial abyss can be found in Kemet and Babylonian Tablets lifted from the ancient Sumerian's. In Kemet the Primordial Waters are the Female Goddess NUN. In Babylon the goddess name is Tiamet the salt water goddess as found in the Enuma Elish. The latter is all through out the bible. So lets look at The Creation Story in Genesis first... Genesis 1:1-10 1In the(A) beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. 2The earth was(B) without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. 3And God said,(C) "Let there be light," and there was light. 4And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness. 5God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day. 6And God said,(D) "Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters." 7And God made the expanse and(E) separated the waters that were under the expanse from the waters that were(F) above the expanse. And it was so. 8And God called the expanse Heaven.[c] And there was evening and there was morning, the second day. 9And God said,(G) "Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear." And it was so. 10God called the dry land Earth,[d] and the waters that were gathered together he called Seas. And God saw that it was goodNow you say where is the goddess. Well if you look closely you will see when the "God" separates the waters from the waters. Doesn't make sense does it? Lets see what the Enuma Elish says When on high heaven was not named, And the earth beneath did not yet bear a name, And the primeval Apsû, who begat them, And chaos, Tiamat, the mother of them both, Their waters were mingled together, And no field was formed, no marsh was to be seen; When of the gods none had been called into being
Well in the Enuma Elish Aspu is styled as the male or the sweet fresh water and Tiamet is styled as the chaos, the female or the saltwater and their waters MIX. This created the lesser gods. It is stated the Gods all live inside of Tiamet and they make noise. Aspu wanted to kill them and Tiamet disagreed. To stop Aspu she warned Ea one of the lesser gods who put Aspu to sleep and then killed him. Ea and his consort Damkina have a son and name him Marduk the storm god who was greater than his father. He is given the power of the wind to play with. This disturbs Tiamet who also has been persuaded to seek revenge for the death of Aspu whom she didn't want necessarily to be killed just stopped from killing the lesser Gods. She gets 11 Gods and they are led by her new husband Kingu and she also gives him the Tablet of Destinies (also known as the Constitutional Laws of the Universe biblically known as the Book Of Life). The other Gods known as the Annanuki anoint Marduk as the one who will defend them. Marduk goes and kills Tiamet and he splits her in half(separating the waters) and created the heavens and the earth(as above so below) with her body(the waters) Marduk then kills Kingu takes the Tablet of Destinies and with Kingu's blood the Annanuki created man in their image and likeness. (Genesis 1:26 26And God said, Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.)
Still not convinced..Tiamet was the primordial waters mother of the gods but also manifested as a Dragon or Serpent of the sea. Lets trek over to Isaiah and see if we can find another hidden God and Goddess.... Isaiah 27:1 27:1In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.
Sounds like the fight between Tiamet and the lesser gods with Marduk and the Annanuki to me... hmmpf still not convinced... Lets go over to Revelations Revelations 12:1-9 1And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: 2And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. 3And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. 4And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born. 5And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. 6And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. 7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, 8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. 9And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
Wow... did Tiamet go back in time in an attempt to stop Marduk from being born? The Man Child? Now this is where the bybull writers tell on themselves that this Serpent Dragon is none other than TIamet the primordial waters goddess of Ancient Babylon. Revelations 17:1-8 1And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: 2With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. 3So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 4And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: 5And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. 6And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration. 7And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns. 8The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. The mystery of her name is solved and it is Tiamet. You use her in the creation story then style her as the great whore of Babylon the very home of the Enuma Elish. This isn't talking about America or any nation it is code covering the tracks of one in many foundations and places the biblical writers (old testament and new) lifted from. If any rit of any Org has hidden goddess' or god's the bybull is the blue print. This is the very reason you see such vileness towards women when it comes to spirituality. The creator was seen as a goddess. A queen mother. Always associated with water. Nun, Tiamet, Yemaya, Aiyda Weddo are all associated with water or serpents or both. Bible beaters will you embrace your roots? Next up Decoding the Bible- The Hidden 7 Seers #2
|
|
|
Post by water on Mar 31, 2009 23:42:31 GMT -5
Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of EL. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again. The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Apr 1, 2009 15:25:13 GMT -5
How many ancient manuscripts of these events exist today? I just googled the historical reliabilty of the Bab. Tablets and the Enuma Elish and the sites came up with a common pattern, that these tablets confirm the historical reliability of the Bible. These stories and tablets are just proof that the bible is true, and these are mere accounts of what the bible says.
I found nothing as far as serious evidence of their own reliability, but the reliability of scripture always show up.
Questions: Is truth absolute? Is Jesus God? Is Jesus the Truth?
|
|
|
Post by No Screen Name on Apr 1, 2009 15:35:07 GMT -5
Wow, denounced! This is the most rational post I've ever seen you make. It's almost like you want to have a rational discussion with some facts to support your views!
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Apr 1, 2009 15:58:27 GMT -5
How many ancient manuscripts of these events exist today? I just googled the historical reliabilty of the Bab. Tablets and the Enuma Elish and the sites came up with a common pattern, that these tablets confirm the historical reliability of the Bible. These stories and tablets are just proof that the bible is true, and these are mere accounts of what the bible says. I found nothing as far as serious evidence of their own reliability, but the reliability of scripture always show up. Questions: Is truth absolute? Is Jesus God? Is Jesus the Truth? So christianity is older than the Sumerian's? Kemet too huh? How about Hinduism and the Rig Veda. The bible uses lots of symbolism that without doubt predates its construction. Do you agree that this hidden goddess is in the bible? Shall we compare Jacob's ladder with earlier accounts of this vision of what is now known as the DNA Particle that Jacob said the angels descending and ascended from? The incommunicable name that both Moses and Enoch were given? Where is that found Denounced? Yeah we gonna decode your bybull see if we can find some more hidden entities... from a time before
|
|
|
Post by Noble Work on Apr 1, 2009 16:09:22 GMT -5
Well to me it made perfection sense. I focused on the word Expanse (not Heaven) and what it means. If there was was nothing on Earth during the phase of Creation then that's all would be to separate....the waters.
Now I was always taught that my God was a jealous God and he is One. Why would he create another.
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Apr 2, 2009 14:56:06 GMT -5
VP- Didn't or can't answer the questions. Not saying you have to, just wondering.
W2BDN- Why would he tolerate another, as in masonry's gods?
The Kingdom of Ebla Tablets pre-date the bible, yet and still establish certain historical facts, such as writing before Moses' era.
"The Ebla Tablets - Ancient Sumerian Confirmation Of Historical Biblical Details Have you ever heard of the Ebla tablets?
The Ebla Tablets were originally discovered in northern Syria by two professors from the University of Rome, Dr. Paolo Matthiae and Dr. Giovanni Petinato. Since 1974, 17,000 priceless tablets have been found from the time of the ancient Ebla Kingdom."
So I do not doubt that there is evidence that pre-dates Christianity and the construction of the Bible, but there is NOTHING that pre-dates the pre-incarnate Christ. He could have had the Bible constructed 2 years ago. Time cannot interfere with simultaneous divine inspiration.
I never knew that repentance needed to be decoded. I believe Luke 13:3 does a fine job.
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Apr 2, 2009 15:41:41 GMT -5
Denounced... are you stating that blatant plagiarism denotes confirmation? The Babylonian myths are more different than they are the same as in concern to the Tanakh. Does the advent of Auset Ausar and Heru confirm the story of Mary, Joseph and Jesus written around 90-100 CE when the former was written 4,000 years ago? Cmon guy. Plagiarism is plagiarism and it can't be used as confirmation. It is obvious the writers of these tales in which you call the bible have lifted from other tales from before to construct there own. They can be found in: Kemet, Cush, Ancient Sumeria, The Rigveda of Hinduism in India, I-Ching in China, Zoroastrian Magi etc.
Question if the older tablets confirm the bible then why do the writers of the bible paint the areas in which the older versions of these stories are found as bad? It never fails . Every place where the foundation for these plagiarized stories are found in the bible they are shown as evil. Egypt and the Pharaoh. Cush and the Candace's. Babylon with Sodom and Gommarohh. If these are the forefathers of your knowledge then why lie about their lands? Why lie and say your ancestors built the pyramids and you were slaves in Kemet? Why lie and say your god destroyed Kemet with famine? Why go against Cush? Why not affirm that this knowledge was passed down instead of taking bit and pieces only to encircle it with fiction? Submission pathmakers if you ask me.
As for your questions... Truth is absolute.. Jesus is NOT God. Jesus is NOT the truth.
|
|
|
Post by Noble Work on Apr 2, 2009 16:24:17 GMT -5
W2BDN- Why would he tolerate another, as in masonry's gods?
UMMM ok? First, masonry does NOT have a God. Respectfully asking, where did you get this or hear this?
Second, I am a Christian Brother and I was referring to my Christian God. They one that, through is son Jesus Christ I will be awarded with the gift of Heaven. My Christian God, My DADDY, MY FATHER IN HEAVEN, WHOM ALL BLESSING FLOW; when I tell/told him I accepted his son Jesus Christ (my brother) as my Lord and Savior, GOD my Father!!! shows up when I'm hungry, he shows up at the hospital, he shows up right before a car accident, he shows up when my babies are sick and most of all HE shows up just because. He's ALWAYS welcome in my (HIS) home.
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Apr 6, 2009 4:09:39 GMT -5
Then to who do masons go after death? The answer is in your FIRST degree. I suggest you get acquainted with it. I suggest you get acquainted with the EA Charge as well concerning whether or not FM has a god or gods.
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Apr 6, 2009 4:15:00 GMT -5
So then Jesus is a Liar and Jesus is not God!!!!!! Well the evidence is there, and it has to be ignored, and by the way, God does not plagiarize, He insipres.......
You offered no prrof of historical reliability for ALL this STUFF you have mentioned, why?
So then Jesus is a Liar and Jesus is not God!!!!!!- Anything to add my Christian Brother? Anything to say to VP?
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Apr 6, 2009 7:04:04 GMT -5
So then Jesus is a Liar and Jesus is not God!!!!!! Well the evidence is there, and it has to be ignored, and by the way, God does not plagiarize, He insipres....... You offered no prrof of historical reliability for ALL this STUFF you have mentioned, why? So then Jesus is a Liar and Jesus is not God!!!!!!- Anything to add my Christian Brother? Anything to say to VP? As I said previously VP, where are your sources? Your theories are the basis of the false cause fallacy. Two separate, yet seemingly similar events occurring at different times DOES NOT MEAN that one cuased the other. If this is not enough, you should be aware that even the ardently anti-Christian group Internet Infidels has warned of the gross historical inaccuracies in Kersey Graves’ book: The World’s Sixteen Crucified Saviors: Or Christianity Before Christ is unreliable, but no comprehensive critique exists. Most scholars immediately recognize many of his findings as unsupported and dismiss Graves as useless. …: *Graves often does not distinguish his opinions and theories from what his sources and evidence actually state. *Graves often omits important sources and evidence. *Graves often mistreats in a biased or anachronistic way the sources he does use. *Graves occasionally relies on suspect sources. *Graves does little or no source analysis or formal textual criticism. *Graves’ work is totally uninformed by modern social history (a field that did not begin to be formally pursued until after World War II, i.e., after Graves died). *Graves’ conclusions and theories often far exceed what the evidence justifies, and he treats both speculations and sound theories as of equal value. *Graves often ignores important questions of chronology and the actual order of plausible historical influence, and completely disregards the methodological problems this creates. *Graves’ work lacks all humility, which is unconscionable given the great uncertainties that surround the sketchy material he had to work with. *Graves’ scholarship is obsolete, having been vastly improved upon by new methods, materials, discoveries, and textual criticism in the century since he worked. In fact, almost every historical work written before 1950 is regarded as outdated and untrustworthy by historians today. It seems unwise to rely on a book that even informed anti-Christians regard as extremely unreliable and embarrassing, especially when your eternal destiny is at stake. Freke and Gandy are also fringe authors not scholars, and their claims are unsupported in the academic world, which is hardly friendly to Christianity. Regards Jonathan Sarfati creation.com/was-christianity-plagiarized-from-pagan-myths
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Apr 6, 2009 11:37:31 GMT -5
Denounced how can you as a Christian man ask a person for truth when you use faith where you stand?
I answered 4 days ago brother Truth is Absolute. Jesus isn't truth BECAUSE Jesus is NOT Absolute. The thing is you are ignorant to the truth but you are not ignorant of the truth. You yourself (as all Christians usually do) stated that TRUTH IS ABSOLUTE. In order for your god Jesus to be truth then he needs to manifest everywhere. You can't say the predated religions confirm Jesus on one hand but on the other these same religions are evil and of false gods (As your own damn text states) That is lukewarm as hell. You and every damn Christian knows it. You just CHOOSE to stay ignorant.
I'll say this. Regardless of what Omegas, Alphas, Kappas, Sigmas, AKA's, Delta's, Zeta's, SGRHO's Masons, Elks, and whom every else I didn't include in their ritual it pales in comparison to your faith and what it fulfills. The next time you attempt to belittle someone as in concern to their ritual you need to first look at what you represent.
This weekend April 12 marks Easter which is the Christian Passover. It is Jesus being fashioned as the Lamb of Passover and affirming that the actions of the Passover are right and he is here to finish the job... Well what is the Passover denounced?
In the bible Noah had 3 Sons before the flood. One son who failed to Neglect his nakedness while drunk was HAM. It is stated because of this his son's would be cursed and be the slaves to the Sons of his brothers.
Ham's son's were Canaan, Cush, Mizraim, and Put. The Talmud goes into "How" they were cursed. Cush, Mizraim and Put all in hebrew cyclopedic index equate to black. So per biblical text these were black folk. Cush=Ethiopia, Mizraim=Egypt, Put=Libya. All African Countries. Cush also equates to BLACK FACE in hebrew. Cushan Rithasiam(sp) = Extra Wicked.
The PASSOVER was a ritual done by the Jews who were in Egypt (Kemet as they called it which means BLACK) as slaves so they can be delivered. What did they have to do Denounced?
Lets see...
Gen 12:1-14 1And the LORD spake unto Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt saying, 2This month shall be unto you the beginning of months: it shall be the first month of the year to you. 3Speak ye unto all the congregation of Israel, saying, In the tenth day of this month they shall take to them every man a lamb, according to the house of their fathers, a lamb for an house: 4And if the household be too little for the lamb, let him and his neighbour next unto his house take it according to the number of the souls; every man according to his eating shall make your count for the lamb. 5Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year: ye shall take it out from the sheep, or from the goats: 6And ye shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening. 7And they shall take of the blood, and strike it on the two side posts and on the upper door post of the houses, wherein they shall eat it. 8And they shall eat the flesh in that night, roast with fire, and unleavened bread; and with bitter herbs they shall eat it. 9Eat not of it raw, nor sodden at all with water, but roast with fire; his head with his legs, and with the purtenance thereof. 10And ye shall let nothing of it remain until the morning; and that which remaineth of it until the morning ye shall burn with fire. 11And thus shall ye eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste: it is the LORD's passover. 12For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment: I am the LORD. 13And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where ye are: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Egypt. 14And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.
So lets get this straight..... The Jewish God(YHWH) told them to each get a Lamb... Slaughter all at the same time at Twilight (Ritual Sacrifice). Drain the blood and cook the Lamb whole Head included. THEN take the blood and put it on your side post and door post. The muthafucka even said how they should be clothed and how they should eat it in Haste... THEN it gets better. This blood ritual was done so that there God could "strike down" EVERY first born Male Child(Black Babies included!) and Animal of Kemet.
Why didn't Jesus stand against this? Why does Jesus Affirm this ritual Denounced?
I have a son. He isn't my first born but regardless this Murderous Cult shit above gets a no go from me homie. The cold vein is there were NEVER ANY JEWS IN KEMET THAT WERE ENSLAVED. The entire story was and is fiction. That fact makes it worse. Why would the writers of this text concoct a story like that. To kill Black Babies. Black Male Babies at that.
THESE PECKERWOODS CELEBRATE THIS CHIT TO THIS DAY.
You ignorant niggahs and your Jesus affirming this murderous cult ritual of fiction don't realize this story was the basis for slavery. Why it was seen as okay with the brutual rape, killing and torture of our ancestors funded by these same Zionist peckerwoods.
I have no time for ignorance. You just make sure you tell your Son's(if you have any) and the people in your flock the truth Denounced. Don't explain one ritual and not explain the other. If Omega taught you anything it's that being Lukewarm is NOT allowed. EVER. Either you get in the cut or you don't. Either you tell the truth or you lie.
Which will you choose Denounced?
|
|
|
Post by Noble Work on Apr 6, 2009 14:12:00 GMT -5
Then to who do masons go after death? The answer is in your FIRST degree. I suggest you get acquainted with it. I suggest you get acquainted with the EA Charge as well concerning whether or not FM has a god or gods. I Don't know where MASONS go to. I was/am saved long before I was a Freemason. And the way I was taught and raised is do good deeds, serve your mother and father, feed and love your neighbor (including you), so forth and so on. I was raised to believe that after my soul is retired from THIS life then, GOD shall have it in Heaven. Before you even try to step to me with a tired weak argument thinking that an EA ritual (1st degree) will support your platform, then you have a lot to learn....Not about me but about yourself so Go check it. As if you are HOLIER than Thou
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Apr 6, 2009 14:19:05 GMT -5
Denounced how can you as a Christian man ask a person for truth when you use faith where you stand?
I answered 4 days ago brother Truth is Absolute. Jesus isn't truth BECAUSE Jesus is NOT Absolute. The thing is you are ignorant to the truth but you are not ignorant of the truth. You yourself (as all Christians usually do) stated that TRUTH IS ABSOLUTE. In order for your god Jesus to be truth then he needs to manifest everywhere. You can't say the predated religions confirm Jesus on one hand but on the other these same religions are evil and of false gods (As your own damn text states) That is lukewarm as hell. You and every damn Christian knows it. You just CHOOSE to stay ignorant.
I'll say this. Regardless of what Omegas, Alphas, Kappas, Sigmas, AKA's, Delta's, Zeta's, SGRHO's Masons, Elks, and whom every else I didn't include in their ritual it pales in comparison to your faith and what it fulfills. The next time you attempt to belittle someone as in concern to their ritual you need to first look at what you represent.
This weekend April 12 marks Easter which is the Christian Passover. It is Jesus being fashioned as the Lamb of Passover and affirming that the actions of the Passover are right and he is here to finish the job... Well what is the Passover denounced?
In the bible Noah had 3 Sons before the flood. One son who failed to Neglect his nakedness while drunk was HAM. It is stated because of this his son's would be cursed and be the slaves to the Sons of his brothers.
Ham's son's were Canaan, Cush, Mizraim, and Put. The Talmud goes into "How" they were cursed. Cush, Mizraim and Put all in hebrew cyclopedic index equate to black. So per biblical text these were black folk. Cush=Ethiopia, Mizraim=Egypt, Put=Libya. All African Countries. Cush also equates to BLACK FACE in hebrew. Cushan Rithasiam(sp) = Extra Wicked.
The PASSOVER was a ritual done by the Jews who were in Egypt (Kemet as they called it which means BLACK) as slaves so they can be delivered. What did they have to do Denounced?
Lets see... Gen 12:1-14 1And the LORD spake unto Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt saying, 2This month shall be unto you the beginning of months: it shall be the first month of the year to you. 3Speak ye unto all the congregation of Israel, saying, In the tenth day of this month they shall take to them every man a lamb, according to the house of their fathers, a lamb for an house: 4And if the household be too little for the lamb, let him and his neighbour next unto his house take it according to the number of the souls; every man according to his eating shall make your count for the lamb. 5Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year: ye shall take it out from the sheep, or from the goats: 6And ye shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening. 7And they shall take of the blood, and strike it on the two side posts and on the upper door post of the houses, wherein they shall eat it. 8And they shall eat the flesh in that night, roast with fire, and unleavened bread; and with bitter herbs they shall eat it. 9Eat not of it raw, nor sodden at all with water, but roast with fire; his head with his legs, and with the purtenance thereof. 10And ye shall let nothing of it remain until the morning; and that which remaineth of it until the morning ye shall burn with fire. 11And thus shall ye eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste: it is the LORD's passover. 12For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment: I am the LORD. 13And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where ye are: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Egypt. 14And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.
So lets get this straight..... The Jewish God(YHWH) told them to each get a Lamb... Slaughter all at the same time at Twilight (Ritual Sacrifice). Drain the blood and cook the Lamb whole Head included. THEN take the blood and put it on your side post and door post. The muthafucka even said how they should be clothed and how they should eat it in Haste... THEN it gets better. This blood ritual was done so that there God could "strike down" EVERY first born Male Child(Black Babies included!) and Animal of Kemet.
Why didn't Jesus stand against this? Why does Jesus Affirm this ritual Denounced?
I have a son. He isn't my first born but regardless this Murderous Cult shit above gets a no go from me homie. The cold vein is there were NEVER ANY JEWS IN KEMET THAT WERE ENSLAVED. The entire story was and is fiction. That fact makes it worse. Why would the writers of this text concoct a story like that. To kill Black Babies. Black Male Babies at that.
THESE PECKERWOODS CELEBRATE THIS CHIT TO THIS DAY.
You ignorant niggahs and your Jesus affirming this murderous cult ritual of fiction don't realize this story was the basis for slavery. Why it was seen as okay with the brutual rape, killing and torture of our ancestors funded by these same Zionist peckerwoods.
I have no time for ignorance. You just make sure you tell your Son's(if you have any) and the people in your flock the truth Denounced. Don't explain one ritual and not explain the other. If Omega taught you anything it's that being Lukewarm is NOT allowed. EVER. Either you get in the cut or you don't. Either you tell the truth or you lie.
Which will you choose Denounced? When you can come up with some historical evidence for your seemingly intelligent ramblings, you let me know. As for your profane rants against Jesus and the Word of God, the Lord rebuke you. I have nothing more to say on this issue, I can tell when a person has met their match. When they see themselves for the sinners they are, and look to Jesus for their salvation, they accept Him, and obey Him. Enthusiasm is the key to Omega, not Eternal Life. For all who may not understand, Members vs. Men The value of our fraternity is not in numbers, but in men, in real brotherhood. 8 men thoroughly immersed in the true Omega spirit are far greater assets than 80 with lukewarm enthusiasm. Do thy duty that is best, leave unto the Lord the rest.
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Apr 6, 2009 14:22:27 GMT -5
You're a good ole boy mason. You know what is says about masons and eternal life, but know that admitting it means your whole pathetic fraternity has the most extreme of religious views, and that is of eternal life.
Who did your Ancient brethren worship?
I do not have to go and check it, I was one, and know. But you seem to WANT to ignore the facts.
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Apr 6, 2009 14:24:54 GMT -5
I need not go any further than the first degree to prove Freemasonry total and complete lie when believers try to defend it from the Biblical Worldview.
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Apr 6, 2009 14:46:25 GMT -5
Evidence?
Where is the Noah's Ark Denounced?
Where is the Ark of the Covenant Denounced?
Where is Solomon's Temple Denounced?
Where is the Proof of Moses Denounced?
Where is the Proof of Abraham Denounced?
Where is the Proof of Jesus Denounced?
Where is the proof of a Global Flood Denounced?
Where is the Proof of the Exodus Denounced?
Evidence? EVIDENCE? A Christian who ask for evidence when he uses FAITH where he stands? Cmon Denounced. Just because the writers of the bybull plagiarized the Enuma Elish, Regveda, Book of the Dead, and the Epic of Gilgamesh (which is where they lifted "Lillith" from in the Talmud) doesn't mean what you are stating is truth. It means you have taken bits and pieces from everywhere and served it up as truth.
PROVE the PASSOVER HAPPENED.
If you can Prove the Passover Happened then your Easter is confirmed.
Thing is your peckerwood father of lies picked the WRONG place to say there ritual took place. Kemet keeps meticulous records. Surely one would have remembered the Passover right? They remembered the Hyksos. They remembered every King and Queen. They know the coordinates of the stars, moon, sun. They built great structures but you want us to believe they FORGOT about mentioning Moses and the Exodus out of Kemet? They forgot to mention the slaves of 400 hundred years allllllllll left on the very same damn day?
You ask for evidence? How dare you even utter the first syllable of the word....
|
|
|
Post by Noble Work on Apr 6, 2009 15:22:40 GMT -5
You're a good ole boy mason. You know what is says about masons and eternal life, but know that admitting it means your whole pathetic fraternity has the most extreme of religious views, and that is of eternal life. Who did your Ancient brethren worship? I do not have to go and check it, I was one, and know. But you seem to WANT to ignore the facts. The only fact that I know is that I worship a God. A Christian God. The one I have to go through Jesus to get to. Lame
|
|
|
Post by Noble Work on Apr 6, 2009 15:31:13 GMT -5
I need not go any further than the first degree to prove Freemasonry total and complete lie when believers try to defend it from the Biblical Worldview. Good for you. That's because you approached Freemasonry thinking it was a Religion (getting your feelings hurt in the process), you realized Freemasonry does not provide a path for Salvation (a doctrine for religion) thus it cannot be a religion. So since it's NOT then you choose to say it worship fake/idle God (s). I'm done.
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Apr 7, 2009 10:01:49 GMT -5
Enthusiasm is the key to Omega, not Eternal Life. For all who may not understand,Members vs. Men The value of our fraternity is not in numbers, but in men, in real brotherhood. 8 men thoroughly immersed in the true Omega spirit are far greater assets than 80 with lukewarm enthusiasm. Do thy duty that is best, leave unto the Lord the rest. Revelation 3:14-2214And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; 15I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. 16So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. 17Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: 18I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. 19As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. 20Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. 21To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. 22He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches. Denounced one thing is apparent... I'd bust your ass in a debate. Learn your bible chump. Even your "Lord" said indifference and rejection are synonymous. Your "Lord" wants steadfast enthusiastic resolve. Either you are with him or you not. If you are undecided...in your text it states he'd spit you out of his mouth. Your TEXT says you CAN'T get to the kingdom of heaven and sit on the throne with "Him" if you are LUKE. Unless that is if you become "ZEALOUS" and repent. Catch up Ninja.
|
|
|
Post by Ms. RedamnDickulous on Apr 9, 2009 21:07:35 GMT -5
I thought everyone knew that the Moses saga was used by Massa to rationalize slavery? Poor Hagar, the African...
|
|
|
Post by LogAKAlly <3'n Keef on Apr 9, 2009 21:10:01 GMT -5
I thought everyone knew that the Moses saga was used by Massa to rationalize slavery? Poor Hagar, the African... And that's where Massa went wrong - he gave the slaves the Bible thinkig they'd accept their positions in life as life - but they identified with Moses and said - hey...LET MY PEOPLE GO! LOL
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Apr 10, 2009 12:57:48 GMT -5
I thought everyone knew that the Moses saga was used by Massa to rationalize slavery? Poor Hagar, the African... And that's where Massa went wrong - he gave the slaves the Bible thinkig they'd accept their positions in life as life - but they identified with Moses and said - hey...LET MY PEOPLE GO! LOL So Black folk accepted slavery until we read the bybull? Interesting. No slave revolts, rebellions until after forced conversion to Christianity huh? smdh
|
|
|
Post by LogAKAlly <3'n Keef on Apr 10, 2009 13:07:50 GMT -5
And that's where Massa went wrong - he gave the slaves the Bible thinkig they'd accept their positions in life as life - but they identified with Moses and said - hey...LET MY PEOPLE GO! LOL So Black folk accepted slavery until we read the bybull? Interesting. No slave revolts, rebellions until after forced conversion to Christianity huh? smdhIt was playful VP - hence the "LOL"
|
|
|
Post by denounced on Apr 10, 2009 17:16:38 GMT -5
Enthusiasm is the key to Omega, not Eternal Life. For all who may not understand,Members vs. Men The value of our fraternity is not in numbers, but in men, in real brotherhood. 8 men thoroughly immersed in the true Omega spirit are far greater assets than 80 with lukewarm enthusiasm. Do thy duty that is best, leave unto the Lord the rest. Revelation 3:14-2214And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; 15I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. 16So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. 17Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: 18I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. 19As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. 20Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. 21To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. 22He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches. Denounced one thing is apparent... I'd bust your ass in a debate. Learn your bible chump. Even your "Lord" said indifference and rejection are synonymous. Your "Lord" wants steadfast enthusiastic resolve. Either you are with him or you not. If you are undecided...in your text it states he'd spit you out of his mouth. Your TEXT says you CAN'T get to the kingdom of heaven and sit on the throne with "Him" if you are LUKE. Unless that is if you become "ZEALOUS" and repent. Catch up Ninja. Debates have rules, MB's don't. If we ever debate, please bring your favorite fish.
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Apr 10, 2009 20:21:42 GMT -5
Revelation 3:14-2214And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; 15I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. 16So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. 17Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: 18I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. 19As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. 20Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. 21To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. 22He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches. Denounced one thing is apparent... I'd bust your ass in a debate. Learn your bible chump. Even your "Lord" said indifference and rejection are synonymous. Your "Lord" wants steadfast enthusiastic resolve. Either you are with him or you not. If you are undecided...in your text it states he'd spit you out of his mouth. Your TEXT says you CAN'T get to the kingdom of heaven and sit on the throne with "Him" if you are LUKE. Unless that is if you become "ZEALOUS" and repent. Catch up Ninja. Debates have rules, MB's don't. If we ever debate, please bring your favorite fish. Either way you'd lose. If it's off of memory no preparation no notes you'd lose....If it is a prepared debate I'd embarrass you. Happy Easter. Tell your children the truth brother./color]
|
|
|
Post by nsync on Apr 11, 2009 15:50:48 GMT -5
I can't stand no body in this thread right now. LOLOLOL
LMBO @ my etwin.
How do we know who plagarized whom? Or whom who or who who or whom whom?
Point is just because a religion was practiced before another, that does not exactly prove that the accepted stories, folklores and modern texts of that religion were established before another.
Or does it...?
|
|
|
Post by nsync on Apr 11, 2009 16:05:33 GMT -5
Isn't every religion and belief system relying on faith? How much can we actually prove otherwise. Much of science has shifted over time revealing things we once did not believe to be true or things we could not understand. Even that is not absolute. At some point you have to believe something you were told unless you gain the knowledge and skill to go out into THE FIELD and do the hands on research yourself. Even then there will be unanswered question which will have to rely on faith and/or speculation to conclude.
How does one know that their holy text is the one and only holy text? By faith. If you were there from the beginning. I'd might think you were using more than faith. Then if you were there to dig up the text, I might think you were using more than faith. Add that to you actually doing the literal translations yourself. Even more I would feel comfortable saying you use more than faith.
If you got it from a text book, a sermon, a casual conversation, etc...you are relying on faith.
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Apr 12, 2009 9:56:20 GMT -5
So Heru,Krishna, Mithra and Dionysus all plagiarized Jesus? Ptah, Marduk plagiarized YHWH? Tiamat plagiarized the serpent? Auset plagiarized Mary? Pointless questions are ignorant without an answer. Which side do you stand on or are you confused? If so then take a deep breath and decide which side you're going to stand on and bring forth a question AND answer for your assertions.
You stated that
How do we know who plagiarized whom? Or whom who or who who or whom whom? Point is just because a religion was practiced before another, that does not exactly prove that the accepted stories, folklores and modern texts of that religion were established before another. Or does it...?
So if we are not to use time as the measuring rod then what are we to use? Give us what you feel is appropriate.
As for religions all of them are false. The true God doesn't need faith, preachers, prophets, warnings, punishments, signs and any other scare tactic that occurs in man's series of attempts to make sense of his ignorance as it pertains to the origins of life and death. True God is absolute and manifest everywhere and everybody knows innately who God is.
|
|