|
|
Post by missb08 on May 12, 2010 0:33:23 GMT -5
 Okay so I saw some frontal pics and wasn't sure but THIS SH!T RIGHT HERE, NI**A...THIS SH!T RIGHT HERE!! I think she is... But anyway, I guess at least he is not married, ANYMORE? Right? |
|
|
|
Post by Sapphire on May 12, 2010 0:59:25 GMT -5
I wouldn't be surprised. They seem to be on that path...
I was wondering maybe
Could I make you my baby
If we do the unthinkable would it make us look crazy
If you ask me I'm ready
If you ask me I'm ready
I know you once said to me
"This is exactly how it should feel when it's meant to be"
Time is only wasting so why wait for eventually?
If we gon' do something 'bout it
We should do it right now
|
|
|
|
Post by missb08 on May 12, 2010 1:17:19 GMT -5
^^ LMAO... I laughed out loud, for real...
|
|
|
|
Post by wambam89 on May 12, 2010 1:30:23 GMT -5
HMMMMM That pic IS real suspect!!!!! I think she is
|
|
|
|
Post by **Dea** on May 12, 2010 2:54:56 GMT -5
there is nothing else it could be....she never had a pudge before. and thats a "there is something in my uterus" pudge. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Southie on May 12, 2010 9:46:12 GMT -5
Hmmm
With so much manipulating of photos, I am not sure about this.
|
|
|
|
Post by nsync on May 12, 2010 12:50:23 GMT -5
I saw her on American Idol like a month or so ago---and concluded she was pregnant.
Man I thought yall had the confirmation! lol
|
|
|
|
Post by missb08 on May 12, 2010 18:07:40 GMT -5
sorry @ Nsync lol
I will keep a lookout on the gossip sites
|
|
|
|
Post by Hummy Jones on May 12, 2010 18:15:18 GMT -5
Wammy!!!!!!!!!!! Where you been???
|
|
|
|
Post by 123Diva on May 12, 2010 22:11:20 GMT -5
I wouldn't be surprised. They seem to be on that path... I was wondering maybe Could I make you my baby If we do the unthinkable would it make us look crazy If you ask me I'm ready If you ask me I'm ready I know you once said to me "This is exactly how it should feel when it's meant to be" Time is only wasting so why wait for eventually? If we gon' do something 'bout it We should do it right now And there we have it. Great mind think alike, Sapphy  |
|
|
|
Post by All Pledging Is Legal on May 12, 2010 22:17:12 GMT -5
What a whore. She breaks up a good marriage and then gets knocked up by the low-life dude. I hope she doesn't expect child support.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chal™ on May 12, 2010 22:20:19 GMT -5
not that it matters, but I don't think she NEEDS child support. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by missb08 on May 12, 2010 22:20:51 GMT -5
What a whore. She breaks up a good marriage and then gets knocked up by the low-life dude. I hope she doesn't expect child support. LMAOOOOOO |
|
|
|
Post by 123Diva on May 12, 2010 22:56:39 GMT -5
I mean....there's a reason why this situation would be UNTHINKABLE.
It's funny how society can de-sensitize to the point of normalizing.
I'm not judging, just saying that this right here ain't IDEAL.
|
|
|
|
Post by **Dea** on May 13, 2010 1:46:05 GMT -5
I actually agree with Apil.....this is not a good look in my book. I kinda been shying away from her since all of this mess came out.
|
|
|
|
Post by peppermint on May 13, 2010 4:19:24 GMT -5
not that it matters, but I don't think she NEEDS child support. lol You're right, she doesn't need child support but the child needs it. The notion that because a woman is rich, she should expect or be okay with being the sole provider for the child bothers me. Anyhoo, Who is the baby daddy? Diva- pointing out that something is wrong isn't judgement. I don't know where we got that from but really... |
|
|
|
Post by Southie on May 13, 2010 8:56:09 GMT -5
If this woman broke up a happy home then that was wrong.
Not sure of the situation, becauase I have been hearing various sides to the story. However, if he was still married and decided to step out on his wife, not a good look.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chal™ on May 13, 2010 9:34:41 GMT -5
not that it matters, but I don't think she NEEDS child support. lol You're right, she doesn't need child support but the child needs it. The notion that because a woman is rich, she should expect or be okay with being the sole provider for the child bothers me. I both agree and disagree with this statement. Yea, the child needs support, but it doesn't have to be financial. If I am more than financially able to care for my child, you can keep your money Just be the father you are suppose to be. |
|
|
|
Post by peppermint on May 13, 2010 9:59:17 GMT -5
You're right, she doesn't need child support but the child needs it. The notion that because a woman is rich, she should expect or be okay with being the sole provider for the child bothers me. I both agree and disagree with this statement. Yea, the child needs support, but it doesn't have to be financial. If I am more than financially able to care for my child, you can keep your money Just be the father you are suppose to be. The problem with this logic is, at what point is the mother's (or custodial parent's) income deemed "enough?" There are too many folks running around thinking that the other parent "got it" and all they have to do is show up. I don't care if it Oprah had a baby. The father needs to man up and actually support the kids. We can say what we want to be PC, but people are more vested in things when it hits the pockets. Kids are not an exception. |
|
|
|
Post by nsync on May 13, 2010 13:14:19 GMT -5
Does anyone have the full edition of the story.
I just heard that Swizz separated from his wife and was dealing with Alicia.
Then I heard the wife got mad and put it out on the internet(s).
Now I hear they(Swizz and exwife) are divorced.
I am so confused. Please help. I can't search all the gossipy articles just to come up with the latest info.
What yall got?
|
|
|
|
Post by nsync on May 13, 2010 13:15:36 GMT -5
Thanks! sorry @ Nsync lol I will keep a lookout on the gossip sites |
|
|
|
Post by missb08 on May 13, 2010 13:46:21 GMT -5
peppermint Swizz Beats, the producer, is supposedly the daddy. @southie Ima dig through bossip for the sites but apparently she is a homewrecker Un momento...
|
|
|
|
Post by missb08 on May 14, 2010 2:28:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Chal™ on May 14, 2010 12:17:49 GMT -5
I both agree and disagree with this statement. Yea, the child needs support, but it doesn't have to be financial. If I am more than financially able to care for my child, you can keep your money Just be the father you are suppose to be. The problem with this logic is, at what point is the mother's (or custodial parent's) income deemed "enough?" There are too many folks running around thinking that the other parent "got it" and all they have to do is show up. I don't care if it Oprah had a baby. The father needs to man up and actually support the kids. We can say what we want to be PC, but people are more vested in things when it hits the pockets. Kids are not an exception. if you can take care of all of that child's needs and (some) wants without causeing financial strain in the lives of you and your other kids (if any) it's enough. I'm sorry, but if Oprah had a baby and tried to get FINANCIAL child support, she is stupid. plain and simple. A lot of women do the child support thing to be spiteful. Hell, give the man a chance to DO the right thing before you put the courts all in your business. |
|
|
|
Post by peppermint on May 14, 2010 13:49:48 GMT -5
The problem with this logic is, at what point is the mother's (or custodial parent's) income deemed "enough?" There are too many folks running around thinking that the other parent "got it" and all they have to do is show up. I don't care if it Oprah had a baby. The father needs to man up and actually support the kids. We can say what we want to be PC, but people are more vested in things when it hits the pockets. Kids are not an exception. if you can take care of all of that child's needs and (some) wants without causeing financial strain in the lives of you and your other kids (if any) it's enough. I'm sorry, but if Oprah had a baby and tried to get FINANCIAL child support, she is stupid. plain and simple. A lot of women do the child support thing to be spiteful. Hell, give the man a chance to DO the right thing before you put the courts all in your business. I didn't say go to the courts first but as a parent, financially supporting your child should not be an option. All that 'she or he spends time with the child" is some bull. At LEAST make sure you have clothing, diapers, food, etc for the child when you are together. Oprah would not be stupid, she would be a mother who is holding the father of her child responsible for his part. The court shouldn't HAVE to intervene. People have just become complacent with being irresponsible for their actions. It's not about the other parent, it's about the child. Some parents are spiteful but that doesn't mean you don't handle your responsiblity because the other person is a jerk. |
|
|
|
Post by Chal™ on May 14, 2010 16:11:01 GMT -5
I understand what you are saying, pep. It's just that people make "child support" a solely financial thing and it isn't. I'd rather you go get the things the child needs than give money. Money is so impersonal. It does not build relationships with the kids at all. Bring them diapers. Bring them formula. Mring them clothes. and as they get older continue to do so. Buy that basketball goal and let them help you put it up. Buy the new shoes and school clothes. Show up for the games and/or recitals. Don't turn your child into a check that comes once a month. You don't have to give me a dime, just support your child.
|
|
map2010
I am just a newbie
Posts: 19
|
Post by map2010 on May 15, 2010 3:49:42 GMT -5
Selfish chicks try to do it "all" on their own. They aren't stupid. Just selfish.
|
|
