|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 24, 2010 12:24:24 GMT -5
Gurl, puh-leese. Your founders STILL wanted to be members of my org. They didn't decide on their own to break and start a new one, they were forced to by Nellie Quander. Don't act like you all came up with the idea on your own to leave and start a new, cause ya'll didn't. You were given an ultimatium and that's when you all left, when Nellie said get right or get gone, lol! And prototype fail? I would run with you on this, only if the organization cesed to exist, but we got 102 years in this despite your founders' futile attempt to destory what Ethel Lyle started. That 102 says a lot. Mirrors and tea parties? Obviously, your founders liked it or they wouldn't have pledged AKA.   *p* 1. This is all jokes y'all. It just passes the time 2. Kyng is an instigating so and so. *pulls curtain so kyng can't watch anymore* 3. Juice, y'all outnumber us like 5 to 1 up in this piece. Not that you need the help, but where are all your people? I expected Hyp and I to be surrounded like Agent Smith did Neyo in the Matrix  *p* I love how y'all throw out that 102 all the time. What's your incorporation date Juice? Lemme tell ya. January 29, 1913. Y'all were a club up until then. You were incorporated the same year we were and it was you should thank your lucky stars Nellie (I think of Little house on the prairie EVERY time I hear her name) came back and resurrected what was left after the ENTIRE CHAPTER decided to start fresh. *p* OMG, how much would I love a seance where we could settle the forced out/left discrepancy once and for all! *p* My founders tried it your way and then realized how off the path they were. They corrected the mistake and chose crimson and cream over puke and pepto bismol. Green part, didn't you know? All you need is on AKA. We can stand our own and don't neccessarily need back up, lol! j/k. Blue part, you all were NOT incoporated in 1913. It wasn't until 1930. So if we want to go off incoporation dates has a foundation of an acutal sorority, then by that logic you all were just a club for 17 years! While if we go with your logic, we were for only 5. 17 year, 5 years. 17 years, 5 years. You do the math, lol! Purple part, forced to start fresh Orange part, funny that your two colors you FINALLY decide to settle with (weren't you struggling between red and white and red and gold, lol) that put together it makes the very same color of the org. your founders are members of. Thank you for the reverance, lol! |
|
|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Mar 24, 2010 12:37:20 GMT -5
*p* 1. This is all jokes y'all. It just passes the time 2. Kyng is an instigating so and so. *pulls curtain so kyng can't watch anymore* 3. Juice, y'all outnumber us like 5 to 1 up in this piece. Not that you need the help, but where are all your people? I expected Hyp and I to be surrounded like Agent Smith did Neyo in the Matrix *p* I love how y'all throw out that 102 all the time. What's your incorporation date Juice? Lemme tell ya. January 29, 1913. Y'all were a club up until then. You were incorporated the same year we were and it was you should thank your lucky stars Nellie (I think of Little house on the prairie EVERY time I hear her name) came back and resurrected what was left after the ENTIRE CHAPTER decided to start fresh. *p* OMG, how much would I love a seance where we could settle the forced out/left discrepancy once and for all! *p* My founders tried it your way and then realized how off the path they were. They corrected the mistake and chose crimson and cream over puke and pepto bismol. Green part, didn't you know? All you need is on AKA. We can stand our own and don't neccessarily need back up, lol! j/k. Blue part, you all were NOT incoporated in 1913. It wasn't until 1930. So if we want to go off incoporation dates has a foundation of an acutal sorority, then by that logic you all were just a club for 17 years! While if we go with your logic, we were for only 5. 17 year, 5 years. 17 years, 5 years. You do the math, lol! Purple part, forced to start fresh Orange part, funny that your two colors you FINALLY decide to settle with (weren't you struggling between red and white and red and gold, lol) that put together it makes the very same color of the org. your founders are members of. Thank you for the reverance, lol! Have you been using Wiki as a source again Juice? Delta was incorporated February 18, 1913 (as Alpha Chapter) but I wouldn't expect you to reflect history accurately. I know that's not y'all strong suit And as for the colors....exactly! Figure out how to make pink without red and white and we'll talk! |
|
|
|
Post by LogAKAlly <3'n Keef on Mar 24, 2010 12:38:22 GMT -5
Aww hell...
starts to run out...but gives a sly smile and sashays back in....
Riddle me this - yall Founders had beef/issues with the way thangs was being ran...
but I'm confused - the ENTIRE chapter left?!
Who was they beefin wit? Themselves??
Soror Nelly and the others weren't as hands-on with them as some believe (which is evident by Nelly NOT realizing what was going on until it was almost too late).
I mean....thangs couldn'tve been all dat bad - they knew what AKA was about right? AKA had been around for 5 years, they had time vette it out...
AND...the idea of forming a NEW org wasn't far fetched...
by 1913 Kappa Alpha Psi and Omega Psi Phi were created AFTER Alpha Phi Alpha...
BOTH by folks of color....
soooooooooo, things must have been satisfactory to them....
the colors, service, motto, symbol, etc. or why would they pledge it instead of creating their own???
;D
So, let's just admit it - they made a commitment/took an oath/took a pledge and totally disregarded it/made a OOPS *hee hee* and that's just it.
I mean, to say AKA was subpar is to say your Founders joined/pledged a subpar Org by choice.
*Kanye Shrug*
*walks away whistling*
|
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 24, 2010 12:41:10 GMT -5
Green part, didn't you know? All you need is on AKA. We can stand our own and don't neccessarily need back up, lol! j/k. Blue part, you all were NOT incoporated in 1913. It wasn't until 1930. So if we want to go off incoporation dates has a foundation of an acutal sorority, then by that logic you all were just a club for 17 years! While if we go with your logic, we were for only 5. 17 year, 5 years. 17 years, 5 years. You do the math, lol! Purple part, forced to start fresh Orange part, funny that your two colors you FINALLY decide to settle with (weren't you struggling between red and white and red and gold, lol) that put together it makes the very same color of the org. your founders are members of. Thank you for the reverance, lol! Have you been using Wiki as a source again Juice? Delta was incorporated February 18, 1913 (as Alpha Chapter) but I wouldn't expect you to reflect history accurately. I know that's not y'all strong suit And as for the colors....exactly! Figure out how to make pink without red and white and we'll talk! Red part, seriously? That's what you want to run off of? So all the other chapters after Alpha didn't matter huh. They were just "a social club". They weren't official. They didn't matter at all. I would tell you how to make pink without red and white, if you can start your history without talking about the pink and green. You can't, ROFL! |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 24, 2010 12:43:30 GMT -5
Aww hell... starts to run out...but gives a sly smile and sashays back in.... Riddle me this - yall Founders had beef/issues with the way thangs was being ran...
but I'm confused - the ENTIRE chapter left?!
Who was they beefin wit? Themselves??Soror Nelly and the others weren't as hands-on with them as some believe (which is evident by Nelly NOT realizing what was going on until it was almost too late). I mean....thangs couldn'tve been all dat bad - they knew what AKA was about right? AKA had been around for 5 years, they had time vette it out... AND...the idea of forming a NEW org wasn't far fetched... by 1913 Kappa Alpha Psi and Omega Psi Phi were created AFTER Alpha Phi Alpha... BOTH by folks of color.... soooooooooo, things must have been satisfactory to them.... the colors, service, motto, symbol, etc. or why would they pledge it instead of creating their own??? ;D So, let's just admit it - they made a commitment/took an oath/took a pledge and totally disregarded it/made a OOPS *hee hee* and that's just it. I mean, to say AKA was subpar is to say your Founders joined/pledged a subpar Org by choice. *Kanye Shrug* *walks away whistling* Green part, I laughed so hard I got tears! Go ahead soror at the whole post! Preach! |
|
|
|
Post by Elegance1913 on Mar 24, 2010 18:04:58 GMT -5
Ok…you guys are good…suckered me to get involve…plus, I can’t leave my Soror hanging if it is now truly 5 to 1 up in here. LOL…I tell ya….you guys are funny…but let me lend a little logic here… Our Founders had issues (or beef) with the current structure of the org thus as the current members (since the concept of alumnae members was not implemented at this point) wanted to make changes. So no – they were not “beefing with themselves” but with the current status & structure of the org at that time. Did not our Founders know what they were getting into? To answer this rationally, we cannot judge this based on our research experiences which, depending on when you were made, included researching an org w/ 80-90+ years of existence, having access to members (worldwide) for questions, reading historical documents and articles, and for some, becoming bff’s with Google. Now compare that to researching an org who was in existence for only 4 years and whose ‘alumnae’ base was nowhere near what it is today. Therefore, it is quite understandable to me if they did not fully know what they were getting into and assumed making changes once on the inside would not be such a daunting task. Plus, if we really want to be real about this, all who are greek know that one on the outside will never know as much as they think they do about our org until they get to the other side if successful. That is why I always give folk the “awww, bless her wittle heart” look when they say “Delta has always been in my heart”…that ain’t Delta but admiration for Delta (and for some, organizational infatuation) up in there, but I digress. Also, my Soror is correct – Delta was incorporated in February 1913 but because of the restriction imposed by Howard U. on BOTH organizations, they were only able to apply for incorporation in DC. It was incorporated on a national level with an even broader mission in 1930. Now I will admit that I cannot answer the question as to why they did not start their own org at first. Perhaps it goes back to my previous point re: not knowing until on the other side – but I don’t have a concrete answer. Nor can I answer questions such as ‘why didn’t AKA think to seek incorporation prior to 1913? or ‘why was the second chapter not chartered until after 1912?’. I can only hypothesize… Lastly, assuming that oath probably speak to (or ‘spoke to’ in case it has changed over the years-I dunno) building AKA, they probably felt they were doing just that, but some didn’t see it that way…oh well…c’est la vie. But that’s OK - their decision to be committed to making the world better was not an ‘opps’ but a move from which our communities and the world at large continue to reap the benefits. Now, in the spirit of unity, OOOOP-Skee ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 24, 2010 19:07:00 GMT -5
Dang it Elle! We were having fun with our little e-cat fight and little stabs back and forth, then you come being all fair minded, lololololol with no little jabs or nothing, lol! You not allowed to play anymore, lololololol!
On the real, long time no see, how you been?
|
|
|
|
Post by Elegance1913 on Mar 25, 2010 6:44:06 GMT -5
Dang it Elle! We were having fun with our little e-cat fight and little stabs back and forth, then you come being all fair minded, lololololol with no little jabs or nothing, lol! You not allowed to play anymore, lololololol! On the real, long time no see, how you been? LOL...like I said, couldn't leave my Soror hanging. Plus, this isn't the first time I've been banned from playing. I think the last time it had something to do with dipping someone's jump rope in urine or something. AKADHW? I'm tryna keep up with the name changes...I think the last name change I saw was Juicy. But everytime I saw your current name, I thought it was wordplay by an artsy student or alum of Julliard. We could have just had one of our ninja battles instead...definitely a lot more fun. ;D It has been a minute...but the Healthcare discussion here kept me tuned in. But I am doing fine - thanks for asking. (squint eyes and limps both wrists) HOW YOU DOING?  How's life treating u? I see you're still up in here holding your own in the debate discussions. |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 25, 2010 7:57:13 GMT -5
Lololololol! Its me Ellie! There is a story behind this name change lololololol! Yes the ninja battles! They were hilarious. I'm ok, life is good. Glad to see you staying in tuned. Yea, I do debate but not as much as I used too. I like to laugh be silly more now, lol!
Tell us what you think of the health care reform! Go to the thread!
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Mar 25, 2010 8:10:36 GMT -5
Aww hell... starts to run out...but gives a sly smile and sashays back in.... Riddle me this - yall Founders had beef/issues with the way thangs was being ran... but I'm confused - the ENTIRE chapter left?! Who was they beefin wit? Themselves?? Soror Nelly and the others weren't as hands-on with them as some believe (which is evident by Nelly NOT realizing what was going on until it was almost too late). I mean....thangs couldn'tve been all dat bad - they knew what AKA was about right? AKA had been around for 5 years, they had time vette it out... AND...the idea of forming a NEW org wasn't far fetched... by 1913 Kappa Alpha Psi and Omega Psi Phi were created AFTER Alpha Phi Alpha... BOTH by folks of color.... soooooooooo, things must have been satisfactory to them.... the colors, service, motto, symbol, etc. or why would they pledge it instead of creating their own??? ;D So, let's just admit it - they made a commitment/took an oath/took a pledge and totally disregarded it/made a OOPS *hee hee* and that's just it. I mean, to say AKA was subpar is to say your Founders joined/pledged a subpar Org by choice. *Kanye Shrug* *walks away whistling* I knew I could count on you to jump in on this! LOL! Who were they beefing with? The graduated but still in the mix sorors of course. You telling me you don't know cases where folks graduate but can't get out of the UG chapter's business?  ??Hmmmmm......ok. Juice and I were joking around with the insults but the bottom line is that AKA was THE game in town. My Founders didn't join a subpar org, they joined THE org. Who wouldn't want to join? Whether you believe the kicked out or voluntarily left version, 22 ladies were initiated into AKA in Fall 1912 and those same 22 ladies formed a new organization in Spring 1913 leaving graduated AKA's to re-form and carry on the original org. Either the AKA's totally misjudged the quality of an ENTIRE LINE and subsequently tried to correct the mistake with some post pledging ultimatums that the 22 rejected or the 22 simply didn't have the freedom to evolve the existing org into what they wanted and chose to not fight the AKA graduates and just start fresh. This and the location of Jimmy Hoffa's body are mysteries for the ages. But the battle will rage on........... |
|
|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Mar 25, 2010 8:12:39 GMT -5
Ok…you guys are good…suckered me to get involve…plus, I can’t leave my Soror hanging if it is now truly 5 to 1 up in here. LOL…I tell ya….you guys are funny…but let me lend a little logic here… Our Founders had issues (or beef) with the current structure of the org thus as the current members (since the concept of alumnae members was not implemented at this point) wanted to make changes. So no – they were not “beefing with themselves” but with the current status & structure of the org at that time. Did not our Founders know what they were getting into? To answer this rationally, we cannot judge this based on our research experiences which, depending on when you were made, included researching an org w/ 80-90+ years of existence, having access to members (worldwide) for questions, reading historical documents and articles, and for some, becoming bff’s with Google. Now compare that to researching an org who was in existence for only 4 years and whose ‘alumnae’ base was nowhere near what it is today. Therefore, it is quite understandable to me if they did not fully know what they were getting into and assumed making changes once on the inside would not be such a daunting task. Plus, if we really want to be real about this, all who are greek know that one on the outside will never know as much as they think they do about our org until they get to the other side if successful. That is why I always give folk the “awww, bless her wittle heart” look when they say “Delta has always been in my heart”…that ain’t Delta but admiration for Delta (and for some, organizational infatuation) up in there, but I digress. Also, my Soror is correct – Delta was incorporated in February 1913 but because of the restriction imposed by Howard U. on BOTH organizations, they were only able to apply for incorporation in DC. It was incorporated on a national level with an even broader mission in 1930. Now I will admit that I cannot answer the question as to why they did not start their own org at first. Perhaps it goes back to my previous point re: not knowing until on the other side – but I don’t have a concrete answer. Nor can I answer questions such as ‘why didn’t AKA think to seek incorporation prior to 1913? or ‘why was the second chapter not chartered until after 1912?’. I can only hypothesize… Lastly, assuming that oath probably speak to (or ‘spoke to’ in case it has changed over the years-I dunno) building AKA, they probably felt they were doing just that, but some didn’t see it that way…oh well…c’est la vie. But that’s OK - their decision to be committed to making the world better was not an ‘opps’ but a move from which our communities and the world at large continue to reap the benefits. Now, in the spirit of unity, OOOOP-Skee ;D GO HEAD WITH THAT SOROR ELLIE!!!!! We were being all trifling and you come in here elevating the conversation to a rational level! LOL! |
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Mar 25, 2010 9:17:08 GMT -5
*Rubs eyes*
Ellie? Is that you?
*Decides that it had to be a mirage and walks away*
|
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 25, 2010 13:01:46 GMT -5
Ok…you guys are good…suckered me to get involve…plus, I can’t leave my Soror hanging if it is now truly 5 to 1 up in here. LOL…I tell ya….you guys are funny…but let me lend a little logic here… Our Founders had issues (or beef) with the current structure of the org thus as the current members (since the concept of alumnae members was not implemented at this point) wanted to make changes. So no – they were not “beefing with themselves” but with the current status & structure of the org at that time. Did not our Founders know what they were getting into? To answer this rationally, we cannot judge this based on our research experiences which, depending on when you were made, included researching an org w/ 80-90+ years of existence, having access to members (worldwide) for questions, reading historical documents and articles, and for some, becoming bff’s with Google. Now compare that to researching an org who was in existence for only 4 years and whose ‘alumnae’ base was nowhere near what it is today. Therefore, it is quite understandable to me if they did not fully know what they were getting into and assumed making changes once on the inside would not be such a daunting task. Plus, if we really want to be real about this, all who are greek know that one on the outside will never know as much as they think they do about our org until they get to the other side if successful. That is why I always give folk the “awww, bless her wittle heart” look when they say “Delta has always been in my heart”…that ain’t Delta but admiration for Delta (and for some, organizational infatuation) up in there, but I digress. Also, my Soror is correct – Delta was incorporated in February 1913 but because of the restriction imposed by Howard U. on BOTH organizations, they were only able to apply for incorporation in DC. It was incorporated on a national level with an even broader mission in 1930. Now I will admit that I cannot answer the question as to why they did not start their own org at first. Perhaps it goes back to my previous point re: not knowing until on the other side – but I don’t have a concrete answer. Nor can I answer questions such as ‘why didn’t AKA think to seek incorporation prior to 1913? or ‘why was the second chapter not chartered until after 1912?’. I can only hypothesize… Lastly, assuming that oath probably speak to (or ‘spoke to’ in case it has changed over the years-I dunno) building AKA, they probably felt they were doing just that, but some didn’t see it that way…oh well…c’est la vie. But that’s OK - their decision to be committed to making the world better was not an ‘opps’ but a move from which our communities and the world at large continue to reap the benefits. Now, in the spirit of unity, OOOOP-Skee ;D GO HEAD WITH THAT SOROR ELLIE!!!!! We were being all trifling and you come in here elevating the conversation to a rational level! LOL! She said she would have resulted to a ninja battle if she had known it was me, lololololol! Those ninja battles were hilarious '91! |
|
|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Mar 25, 2010 13:03:47 GMT -5
Yeah, I saw "dipped in urine" and was like "OKAY THEN". y'all were straight wilin' back in the day. I wish those threads still existed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 25, 2010 13:06:19 GMT -5
Aww hell... starts to run out...but gives a sly smile and sashays back in.... Riddle me this - yall Founders had beef/issues with the way thangs was being ran... but I'm confused - the ENTIRE chapter left?! Who was they beefin wit? Themselves?? Soror Nelly and the others weren't as hands-on with them as some believe (which is evident by Nelly NOT realizing what was going on until it was almost too late). I mean....thangs couldn'tve been all dat bad - they knew what AKA was about right? AKA had been around for 5 years, they had time vette it out... AND...the idea of forming a NEW org wasn't far fetched... by 1913 Kappa Alpha Psi and Omega Psi Phi were created AFTER Alpha Phi Alpha... BOTH by folks of color.... soooooooooo, things must have been satisfactory to them.... the colors, service, motto, symbol, etc. or why would they pledge it instead of creating their own??? ;D So, let's just admit it - they made a commitment/took an oath/took a pledge and totally disregarded it/made a OOPS *hee hee* and that's just it. I mean, to say AKA was subpar is to say your Founders joined/pledged a subpar Org by choice. *Kanye Shrug* *walks away whistling* I knew I could count on you to jump in on this! LOL! Who were they beefing with? The graduated but still in the mix sorors of course. You telling me you don't know cases where folks graduate but can't get out of the UG chapter's business? ??Hmmmmm......ok. Juice and I were joking around with the insults but the bottom line is that AKA was THE game in town. My Founders didn't join a subpar org, they joined THE org. Who wouldn't want to join? Whether you believe the kicked out or voluntarily left version, 22 ladies were initiated into AKA in Fall 1912 and those same 22 ladies formed a new organization in Spring 1913 leaving graduated AKA's to re-form and carry on the original org. Either the AKA's totally misjudged the quality of an ENTIRE LINE and subsequently tried to correct the mistake with some post pledging ultimatums that the 22 rejected or the 22 simply didn't have the freedom to evolve the existing org into what they wanted and chose to not fight the AKA graduates and just start fresh. This and the location of Jimmy Hoffa's body are mysteries for the ages. But the battle will rage on........... Underlined part, they could have thought of new programs to do and implement, etc., but still no one has answered me on what does doing more for the community, as your founders claimed they wanted to do, have to do with changing the name, colors, etc. of the org.? That is cosmetic and has nothing to do with community service. Who joins a org. and then wants to change the cosmetic, so to speak , make up of the org.? Maybe they didn't realize how serious other took the org., who knows. But 22 did pledge AKA, and are still AKAs so take that, take that, take that LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 25, 2010 13:08:01 GMT -5
Yeah, I saw "dipped in urine" and was like "OKAY THEN". y'all were straight wilin' back in the day. I wish those threads still existed. It was the daughters of Ethel against the daughters of Myra, lololol! We had ninja pics and everything. |
|
|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Mar 25, 2010 13:13:15 GMT -5
But 22 did pledge AKA, and are still AKAs so take that, take that, take that LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! *gasps* HOW DARE YOU?!?!? Nah, I'm sure they denounced, broke a mirror, burned an ivy bush, didn't comb their hair for a few days.......y'know something symbolic! |
|
|
|
Post by T-Rex91 on Mar 25, 2010 13:14:29 GMT -5
Yeah, I saw "dipped in urine" and was like "OKAY THEN". y'all were straight wilin' back in the day. I wish those threads still existed. It was the daughters of Ethel against the daughters of Myra, lololol! We had ninja pics and everything. I know y'all did the most with that! LOL!!!!!!!! Is our server here backed up? *looks around for an admin* |
|
|
|
Post by Chal™ on Mar 25, 2010 13:21:07 GMT -5
Who joins a org. and then wants to change the cosmetic, so to speak , make up of the org.? Not who. What!! Get it. What. As in Omega Omicron. Never mind. Continue. lol |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 25, 2010 15:19:45 GMT -5
But 22 did pledge AKA, and are still AKAs so take that, take that, take that LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! *gasps* HOW DARE YOU?!?!? Nah, I'm sure they denounced, broke a mirror, burned an ivy bush, didn't comb their hair for a few days.......y'know something symbolic! ROTFL! They still my sorors! My sorors, your founders, lololololololol! |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 25, 2010 15:20:33 GMT -5
Who joins a org. and then wants to change the cosmetic, so to speak , make up of the org.? Not who. What!! Get it. What. As in Omega Omicron. Never mind. Continue. lol You....are....retarded.....lol! |
|
|
|
Post by Chal™ on Mar 25, 2010 15:24:58 GMT -5
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Elegance1913 on Mar 25, 2010 20:41:08 GMT -5
Underlined part, they could have thought of new programs to do and implement, etc., but still no one has answered me on what does doing more for the community, as your founders claimed they wanted to do, have to do with changing the name, colors, etc. of the org.? That is cosmetic and has nothing to do with community service. Who joins a org. and then wants to change the cosmetic, so to speak , make up of the org.? Maybe they didn't realize how serious other took the org., who knows. But 22 did pledge AKA, and are still AKAs so take that, take that, take that LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! It's called "branding"...companies spend millions on it so it must be somewhat important. As for the last sentence, I know you ain't tryna get Miss Quander upset now. I mean... I understand...who wouldn't want to claim our Founders as their sorors. But Miss Quander may try to put you back on line and beat you with an ivy switch for that one...then she'll be suspended for hazing and it'll be all your fault. |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 25, 2010 21:30:32 GMT -5
Buahahahaha!
|
|
|
|
Post by Oren Ishii on Mar 27, 2010 13:28:17 GMT -5
WHAT in the holy hell?!?!?
I'm not even getting in this...we all know the original (and still best) Sorority founded for, and by, college educated African American women. History tells of our greatness. Delta runs a nice second. *pats DST on the head* ;D
As far as us being 5 to 1 on here, there are like 3 [moderately/frequently] active Sorors on this board, and at least 3 of y'all who are fairly active...so how is that 5:1?
AKAs (regularly active):
Juicy
Kalani (Muse)
Log
A couple more of us pop up occassionally, but we're the regs right now.
DSTs (regularly active):
DD91
FATALe
Hyp
Quiet (by default as Mod)
at least a couple other folks I can't remember right now (Brwn,KingD, Trunks, etc)
*raises eyebrow @ 91*
|
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 27, 2010 13:38:29 GMT -5
Rofl at the pat on the head!
|
|
|
|
Post by LogAKAlly <3'n Keef on Mar 27, 2010 18:43:14 GMT -5
Let's get back to the hair pulling ninja fighting!!  To all the DELTAS....it ain't RIGHT to talk about ya Momma!! *runs out* |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Art on Mar 29, 2010 10:30:16 GMT -5
Let's get back to the hair pulling ninja fighting!! To all the DELTAS....it ain't RIGHT to talk about ya Momma!! *runs out* iDIED! I can always count on you! |
|
|
|
Post by Mrs. Eyes on Mar 29, 2010 11:27:06 GMT -5
Let's get back to the hair pulling ninja fighting!! To all the DELTAS....it ain't RIGHT to talk about ya Momma!! *runs out* Well you know what they say "Mom" Do as I say, not what I do......so we didn't do. LOL! |
|
|
|
Post by Elegance1913 on Mar 29, 2010 13:04:12 GMT -5
snatches crack pipes from Muse and LogAKAlly.I should have known! Now you know you are better than this! This stuff is bad for ya...gotcha talking all outta head...just sad. ;D
|
|
{=}http://s2.images.proboards.com/cool.gif{/=}
How's life treating u? I see you're still up in here holding your own in the debate discussions. 
??Hmmmmm......ok.
