|
|
Post by THE emPRISS on Jul 9, 2009 16:09:11 GMT -5
I'm surprised Bill isn't already apart of a frat. I would have peg him as an alpha. But congrats. Why...because he was an unfaithful politician.? LOL Am I the only one that saw this??? I guess its ok to laugh since it was posted by an Alpha.... ROFLMAO |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 9, 2009 16:15:22 GMT -5
That ninja is a damn COON. Hell NO. Just my opinion of him though. Carry On Yep...just your opinion. We can't all raid the NBA, NFL and MLB rosters. Carry on. Yeah and we can't all get dudes who think its their place to say we need new leadership when he hasn't been groomed to be a leader.. The same mofo who was a weak ass man and ADMITTED he was taught manhood by his middle aged GAY Black Landlord. Miss me with that bullchit. The niggah is a clown and let this be a lesson when you stretch your arms for perceived status on paper. Any bruh that was in the MLB, NBA or NFL wanted to be bruhs before and sought Omega. We don't recruit. Shaq and Chris Jackson wanted to be bruhs while at LSU but Dale Brown wouldn't let them. Vince Carter wanted to get down with Shammond Williams while at UNC and again Dean Smith blocked that and I met the brother at Daytona Beach BCR BEFORE he was in the NBA with Shammond. Steve Harvey's line had "issues" while at Kent State. Like every MAN you see who is a bruh in the sports world are but finishing either what they started or for other reasons what they were not allowed to do. Again Omega doesn't recruit and we are not a status club. So Lets take Shaq's philanthropic work and put it up against Kevin Powell's. I dare you do that. lol Not saying a man can't change his ways but if you yourself have a checkered past... You need to Shut the fuck up and work your own magic. Period. |
|
|
|
Post by Prissy New Year!!! on Jul 9, 2009 16:15:44 GMT -5
I guess I just don't see the big deal in asking the question - I asked about Michelle Obama one time to the AKAs and no one blew up. An Alpha asked today if Steve McNair was a Que. I'm pretty sure it wasn't a Kappa that posted the story about the Tollhouse pledge process. If it was the presentation of the question he already apologized - so I don't see why we can't ask the question - is it true. which is the dumbest bunch of shyt Ive ever heard in my life. Its ok to post stepshow clips or other stuff but let it be something important, or heavens be to baby jesus, something remotely negative...its Christmas in July in here. Naturally, a member of the org isnt going to post it, and as someone said (Cam, I think), its good to know what other folks are dealing with so you can *drumroll please* discuss like adults and perhaps *cymbals clash* avoid the mistake in the future or *tamberine* get some insight into whats going on in our orgs...b/c plz believe these arent isolated org occurrences. Some are far better at discretion than others. Im just letting yall know now, right here, right now on this 9th day of July at 4:44pm EST..... that if I hear something and want an answer....Im asking. If I see an interesting post, Im posting it. And guess what, everyone will GTF over it. I agree that there is a right and wrong way to carry things...no doubt...but people get all up in arms if someone of another org says ANYTHING. ROFL @ all the male panties in a bunch in this thread. FINALLY, not the sister greeks. ;D At the highlighted. I don't think that most folks would be upset at discussing public information regarding their organization; even if it is negative; depending upon how the information is asked. This thread and the FOTWI threads were started by drive by posters. That was not cool. If you are a regular part of OOA, that is one thing but to just drop in and leave some negative information makes people question your motivation, and rightly so. I for one don't have a problem talking about issues in my org, not everyone feels that way and that is their prerogative. But I will not respond kindly to some foolishness that is meant to be disrespectful. What I gathered from Aces and Blu is that they didn't have a problem discussing this, even if it was only to say no comment until an official announcement is made. They just took issue with how the information was given. At the end of the day, we all face a lot of the same issues regardless of our affiliation. None of us are immune to bad press, poor decisions by members in our organizations, and/or high profile honorary membership invitations that cause some discussion. When that type of information hits the public airwaves, we should be able to talk about it. But folks need to understand that if you approach it wrong, you may get the e-smackdown. |
|
|
|
Post by Robelite on Jul 9, 2009 16:32:02 GMT -5
Yep...just your opinion. We can't all raid the NBA, NFL and MLB rosters. Carry on. Yeah and we can't all get dudes who think its their place to say we need new leadership when he hasn't been groomed to be a leader.. The same mofo who was a weak ass man and ADMITTED he was taught manhood by his middle aged GAY Black Landlord. Miss me with that bullchit. The niggah is a clown and let this be a lesson when you stretch your arms for perceived status on paper. Any bruh that was in the MLB, NBA or NFL wanted to be bruhs before and sought Omega. We don't recruit. Shaq and Chris Jackson wanted to be bruhs while at LSU but Dale Brown wouldn't let them. Vince Carter wanted to get down with Shammond Williams while at UNC and again Dean Smith blocked that and I met the brother at Daytona Beach BCR BEFORE he was in the NBA with Shammond. Steve Harvey's line had "issues" while at Kent State. Like every MAN you see who is a bruh in the sports world are but finishing either what they started or for other reasons what they were not allowed to do. Again Omega doesn't recruit and we are not a status club. So Lets take Shaq's philanthropic work and put it up against Kevin Powell's. I dare you do that. lol Not saying a man can't change his ways but if you yourself have a checkered past... You need to Shut the fuck up and work your own magic. Period. Hell, you take Shaq's and put it up against any of those those other names! Hell, he was a philanthropist BEFORE he became your frat brother! Powell nor any of those other mentioned brothers were RECRUITED as you so wrongfully claimed. Hell, they were all college inititates, so you see, their leadership was developed early in their Alpha lives. You'd be a wise motherfucker to take your own damned advice...PERIOD! |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 9, 2009 16:33:36 GMT -5
Yeah and we can't all get dudes who think its their place to say we need new leadership when he hasn't been groomed to be a leader.. The same mofo who was a weak ass man and ADMITTED he was taught manhood by his middle aged GAY Black Landlord. Miss me with that bullchit. The niggah is a clown and let this be a lesson when you stretch your arms for perceived status on paper. Any bruh that was in the MLB, NBA or NFL wanted to be bruhs before and sought Omega. We don't recruit. Shaq and Chris Jackson wanted to be bruhs while at LSU but Dale Brown wouldn't let them. Vince Carter wanted to get down with Shammond Williams while at UNC and again Dean Smith blocked that and I met the brother at Daytona Beach BCR BEFORE he was in the NBA with Shammond. Steve Harvey's line had "issues" while at Kent State. Like every MAN you see who is a bruh in the sports world are but finishing either what they started or for other reasons what they were not allowed to do. Again Omega doesn't recruit and we are not a status club. So Lets take Shaq's philanthropic work and put it up against Kevin Powell's. I dare you do that. lol Not saying a man can't change his ways but if you yourself have a checkered past... You need to Shut the fuck up and work your own magic. Period. Hell, you take Shaq's and put it up against any of those those other names! Hell, he was a philanthropist BEFORE he became your frat brother! You'd be a wise motherfucker to take your own damned advice...PERIOD! Or what Robe skate? Shut your sensitive bitch made ass up ninjah. Type of mofo who probably got slammed up by the bruhs and your chick snatched. Again miss me Clown. |
|
|
|
Post by Bathroom Model on Jul 9, 2009 16:37:31 GMT -5
Is this pledgepark???
|
|
|
|
Post by Robelite on Jul 9, 2009 16:39:31 GMT -5
You're a lame fuck! Talk a bunch of shit on a message board about how "real" or made you are! Give me a fucking break!
Your weak ass knows absolutely NOTHING about how I was initiated into MY frat. You were likely still taking shits in your drawers when I crossed the sands!
Yeah, you're missed, bitch! Matter of fact, your DIS-missed!
|
|
|
|
Post by THE emPRISS on Jul 9, 2009 16:45:07 GMT -5
I dont think it was the question itself but apparently there is some unspoken rule on OOA that if your not in a particular org then you arent allowed to mention/speculate/ or question anything, even if it is public information....which is the dumbest bunch of shyt Ive ever heard in my life. Its ok to post stepshow clips or other stuff but let it be something important, or heavens be to baby jesus, something remotely negative...its Christmas in July in here. Naturally, a member of the org isnt going to post it, and as someone said (Cam, I think), its good to know what other folks are dealing with so you can *drumroll please* discuss like adults and perhaps *cymbals clash* avoid the mistake in the future or *tamberine* get some insight into whats going on in our orgs...b/c plz believe these arent isolated org occurrences. Some are far better at discretion than others. Im just letting yall know now, right here, right now on this 9th day of July at 4:44pm EST..... that if I hear something and want an answer....Im asking. If I see an interesting post, Im posting it. And guess what, everyone will GTF over it. I agree that there is a right and wrong way to carry things...no doubt...but people get all up in arms if someone of another org says ANYTHING. ROFL @ all the male panties in a bunch in this thread. FINALLY, not the sister greeks. ;D At the highlighted. I don't think that most folks would be upset at discussing public information regarding their organization; even if it is negative; depending upon how the information is asked. This thread and the FOTWI threads were started by drive by posters. That was not cool. If you are a regular part of OOA, that is one thing but to just drop in and leave some negative information makes people question your motivation, and rightly so. I for one don't have a problem talking about issues in my org, not everyone feels that way and that is their prerogative. But I will not respond kindly to some foolishness that is meant to be disrespectful. What I gathered from Aces and Blu is that they didn't have a problem discussing this, even if it was only to say no comment until an official announcement is made. They just took issue with how the information was given. At the end of the day, we all face a lot of the same issues regardless of our affiliation. None of us are immune to bad press, poor decisions by members in our organizations, and/or high profile honorary membership invitations that cause some discussion. When that type of information hits the public airwaves, we should be able to talk about it. But folks need to understand that if you approach it wrong, you may get the e-smackdown. How do you know it was a drive by poster? In OOA land, its more likely that it was an alter...probably Denounced, to be honest. Does it really matter who the poster is? A question is a question. As for the FOTWI thread, all she did was post a link. She didnt even say anything and she used to be active on OO, at least I remember seeing her post more then. She got bombarded for just posting a link so I dont think everyone shares the same sentiment re: questions about others orgs. Same happened to Fatal when she posted about Sheryl Underwood and there was nothing malicious about her post at all. She was congratulating ZPB. And she certainly isnt a driveby poster. So I dont believe approach has that much to do with it, even though thats what people are claiming now just because it sounds good (not directed at you). |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 9, 2009 16:45:52 GMT -5
You're a lame fuck! Talk a bunch of shit on a message board about how "real" or made you are! Give me a fucking break! Your weak ass knows absolutely NOTHING about how I was initiated into MY frat. You were likely still taking shits in your drawers when I crossed the sands! Yeah, you're missed, bitch! Matter of fact, your DIS-missed! I must've hit a nerve want me to call the bruhs so you can get your girl back? lol. I share stories on here just like the next person. Niggah you got issues. You calling me Lame is GOOD. I swear everytime I turn around you are fucking complaining like a straight bitch. Oh he did this .. Oh she said that.. Oh remember when SHUT THE fuck UP. damn. lol Get a backbone chump. Your persona reeks of FEMININITY. Now bang on your keyboard screaming like Minny Riperton or get on your cell phone and gossip like a bitch. I know you do both... its the bitch in you. |
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Jul 9, 2009 16:47:02 GMT -5
I dont think it was the question itself but apparently there is some unspoken rule on OOA that if your not in a particular org then you arent allowed to mention/speculate/ or question anything, even if it is public information....which is the dumbest bunch of shyt Ive ever heard in my life. Its ok to post stepshow clips or other stuff but let it be something important, or heavens be to baby jesus, something remotely negative...its Christmas in July in here. Naturally, a member of the org isnt going to post it, and as someone said (Cam, I think), its good to know what other folks are dealing with so you can *drumroll please* discuss like adults and perhaps *cymbals clash* avoid the mistake in the future or *tamberine* get some insight into whats going on in our orgs...b/c plz believe these arent isolated org occurrences. Some are far better at discretion than others. Im just letting yall know now, right here, right now on this 9th day of July at 4:44pm EST..... that if I hear something and want an answer....Im asking. If I see an interesting post, Im posting it. And guess what, everyone will GTF over it. I agree that there is a right and wrong way to carry things...no doubt...but people get all up in arms if someone of another org says ANYTHING. ROFL @ all the male panties in a bunch in this thread. FINALLY, not the sister greeks. ;D At the highlighted. I don't think that most folks would be upset at discussing public information regarding their organization; even if it is negative; depending upon how the information is asked. This thread and the FOTWI threads were started by drive by posters. That was not cool. If you are a regular part of OOA, that is one thing but to just drop in and leave some negative information makes people question your motivation, and rightly so. I for one don't have a problem talking about issues in my org, not everyone feels that way and that is their prerogative. But I will not respond kindly to some foolishness that is meant to be disrespectful. What I gathered from Aces and Blu is that they didn't have a problem discussing this, even if it was only to say no comment until an official announcement is made. They just took issue with how the information was given. At the end of the day, we all face a lot of the same issues regardless of our affiliation. None of us are immune to bad press, poor decisions by members in our organizations, and/or high profile honorary membership invitations that cause some discussion. When that type of information hits the public airwaves, we should be able to talk about it. But folks need to understand that if you approach it wrong, you may get the e-smackdown.
Conversely I thought Sheryl Underwood's election was interesting. But Fatal damn near got pistol whipped for mentioning something that was TOLD to her. It's like there's no rhyme or reason to it. If Bill Clinton and Al Sharpton became Masons could we comment on that or would we also have to wait for the Masons to approve it?
I get what everybody's position - but here's my main point. When the Que with the mitties was posted, it wasn't posted in any tactful way - it was posted in a hee hee ha ha way. I'm cool with Aces, he's good people - but seriously - this thread wasn't started anymore sideways than others that have come before it. |
|
|
|
Post by THE emPRISS on Jul 9, 2009 16:48:46 GMT -5
Who in da hayle left the gate open?! :  |
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Jul 9, 2009 16:50:14 GMT -5
Who in da hayle left the gate open?! : |
|
|
|
Post by Robelite on Jul 9, 2009 16:50:48 GMT -5
You are a weak fuck, Vudu Doll!! And got the nerve to call someone "sensitive"...what a crock!
Your persona reeks of an ignorant ass who knows a little, and thinks he knows alot! Issues? Who is more issue-ridden than YOU? You brought your lame ass to this board trying to tell everyone about everything....none of which you knew!
Backbone? Yeah, right....from the ass who comes here to proclaim his "realness" and made-ness" Like I've said...you are a lame fuck and a joke, kid!! Get you a life, or go buy you one!
You are one sad and strange individual.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 9, 2009 16:51:00 GMT -5
Who in da hayle left the gate open?! : ROOO! to that. |
|
|
|
Post by Bathroom Model on Jul 9, 2009 16:51:36 GMT -5
I'm going to defend the Omega mittes post. Cause I posted it. It wasn't really to dis Omegas it was just funny. If he wasn't wearing nalia or threwing up the hooks I would have posted it on the general talk board. Plus his chest hair was growing in omega formation.
|
|
|
|
Post by THE emPRISS on Jul 9, 2009 16:51:34 GMT -5
At the highlighted. I don't think that most folks would be upset at discussing public information regarding their organization; even if it is negative; depending upon how the information is asked. This thread and the FOTWI threads were started by drive by posters. That was not cool. If you are a regular part of OOA, that is one thing but to just drop in and leave some negative information makes people question your motivation, and rightly so. I for one don't have a problem talking about issues in my org, not everyone feels that way and that is their prerogative. But I will not respond kindly to some foolishness that is meant to be disrespectful. What I gathered from Aces and Blu is that they didn't have a problem discussing this, even if it was only to say no comment until an official announcement is made. They just took issue with how the information was given. At the end of the day, we all face a lot of the same issues regardless of our affiliation. None of us are immune to bad press, poor decisions by members in our organizations, and/or high profile honorary membership invitations that cause some discussion. When that type of information hits the public airwaves, we should be able to talk about it. But folks need to understand that if you approach it wrong, you may get the e-smackdown.
Conversely I thought Sheryl Underwood's election was interesting. But Fatal damn near got pistol whipped for mentioning something that was TOLD to her. It's like there's no rhyme or reason to it. If Bill Clinton and Al Sharpton became Masons could we comment on that or would we also have to wait for the Masons to approve it?
I get what everybody's position - but here's my main point. When the Que with the mitties was posted, it wasn't posted in any tactful way - it was posted in a hee hee ha ha way. I'm cool with Aces, he's good people - but seriously - this thread wasn't started anymore sideways than others that have come before it. I think the difference is when its social stuff i.e. pix, chants, vids....its ok b.c its PRESUMED to be a joke. But if its org business, then its ASSUMED to be malicious. To me it seems like our priorities are all messed up. Not commenting rather than reaming someone out seems like the more appropriate response to me. I get the "approach" concept too, however, like you said there is no rhyme or reason and we have proof positive examples of it. |
|
|
|
Post by THE emPRISS on Jul 9, 2009 16:53:23 GMT -5
@ VP and Robe:
MEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW! CAT FIGHT!!!!
<-runs out
lol
yall cut it out.....MJ said so.
|
|
|
|
Post by THE emPRISS on Jul 9, 2009 16:54:58 GMT -5
I'm going to defend the Omega mittes post. Cause I posted it. It wasn't really to dis Omegas it was just funny. If he wasn't wearing nalia or threwing up the hooks I would have posted it on the general talk board. Plus his chest hair was growing in omega formation. And thats cool...but I guess the question is...that was funny to you so its ok to post, nobody took offense...what if some org business is funny to someone else, thats not ok to post? Im still stuck on the FOTWI...my Soror posted a link that she said she received elsewhere...she was lambasted. People accused her of being malicious...I didnt see how that could even be construed as malicious. Now, THIS original thread? Now, I can see how this could be construed as being malicious. Im just trying to figure out what the rules are but in my estimation we are just making them up as we go along...which I suppose is cool too. |
|
|
|
Post by Vudu_Prince on Jul 9, 2009 16:57:00 GMT -5
You are a weak fuck, Vudu Doll!! And got the nerve to call someone "sensitive"...what a crock! Your persona reeks of an ignorant ass who knows a little, and thinks he knows alot! Issues? Who is more issue-ridden than YOU? You brought your lame ass to this board trying to tell everyone about everything....none of which you knew! Backbone? Yeah, right....from the ass who comes here to proclaim his "realness" and made-ness" Like I've said...you are a lame fuck and a joke, kid!! Get you a life, or go buy you one! You are one sad and strange individual. Yeah yeah YEAH. But Robe Tight listen Baldermen Dummy you're a whore. You Gandy ass niggah. fuck outta here. CLOWN. You want the last word whore? Its yours take it. Now go run up on one of my bruhs and be like "say guy this dude on the internet Vudu.. SHUT THE fuck UP! Get your Ralphie T Passive Aggressive ass on. I debate and discuss and neither can be achieved without a difference of opinion. Your sensitive lukewarm ass is self centered. Last word is yours Twan. |
|
|
|
Post by Robelite on Jul 9, 2009 16:59:22 GMT -5
You are a sorry, stupid fuck, Vudu!! The quicker you get that through your pea-sized brain, the better off you'll be!
And to keep throwing that "sensitive" tag out, after you got your tampon wet from that post I made about the NBA, NFL and MLB makes you look even more ignorant, and frankly, I didn't know ONE person could exhibit that much stupidity!
Dumb ass dog! Good night, you ignorant, idiotic little boy!
|
|
|
|
Post by THE emPRISS on Jul 9, 2009 16:59:23 GMT -5
You are a weak fuck, Vudu Doll!! And got the nerve to call someone "sensitive"...what a crock! Your persona reeks of an ignorant ass who knows a little, and thinks he knows alot! Issues? Who is more issue-ridden than YOU? You brought your lame ass to this board trying to tell everyone about everything....none of which you knew! Backbone? Yeah, right....from the ass who comes here to proclaim his "realness" and made-ness" Like I've said...you are a lame fuck and a joke, kid!! Get you a life, or go buy you one! You are one sad and strange individual. Yeah yeah YEAH. But Robe Tight listen Baldermen Dummy you're a whore. You Gandy ass niggah. fuck outta here. CLOWN. You want the last word whore? Its yours take it. Now go run up on one of my bruhs and be like "say guy this dude on the internet Vudu.. SHUT THE fuck UP! Get your Ralphie T Passive Aggressive ass on. I debate and discuss and neither can be achieved without a difference of opinion. Your sensitive lukewarm ass is self centered. Last word is yours Twan. VP....why dont you mosey on over to the Coleman Corner and get a dose of warm and fuzzies from Edna. and imma need you nota call grown men Twan! really? lol GO! -----------------> |
|
|
|
Post by Prissy New Year!!! on Jul 9, 2009 17:00:00 GMT -5
At the highlighted. I don't think that most folks would be upset at discussing public information regarding their organization; even if it is negative; depending upon how the information is asked. This thread and the FOTWI threads were started by drive by posters. That was not cool. If you are a regular part of OOA, that is one thing but to just drop in and leave some negative information makes people question your motivation, and rightly so. I for one don't have a problem talking about issues in my org, not everyone feels that way and that is their prerogative. But I will not respond kindly to some foolishness that is meant to be disrespectful. What I gathered from Aces and Blu is that they didn't have a problem discussing this, even if it was only to say no comment until an official announcement is made. They just took issue with how the information was given. At the end of the day, we all face a lot of the same issues regardless of our affiliation. None of us are immune to bad press, poor decisions by members in our organizations, and/or high profile honorary membership invitations that cause some discussion. When that type of information hits the public airwaves, we should be able to talk about it. But folks need to understand that if you approach it wrong, you may get the e-smackdown.
Conversely I thought Sheryl Underwood's election was interesting. But Fatal damn near got pistol whipped for mentioning something that was TOLD to her. It's like there's no rhyme or reason to it. If Bill Clinton and Al Sharpton became Masons could we comment on that or would we also have to wait for the Masons to approve it?
I get what everybody's position - but here's my main point. When the Que with the mitties was posted, it wasn't posted in any tactful way - it was posted in a hee hee ha ha way. I'm cool with Aces, he's good people - but seriously - this thread wasn't started anymore sideways than others that have come before it. I guess I see your point. But in defense, the Que with the mitties knew he was going to be clowned...he obviously wanted to be clowned. You can't get upset, he achieved his goal. I will speak for me. If the FOTWI information had been posted by a regular poster, I wouldn't have been upset. The situation is a learning opportunity for all of us, so as long as it wasn't done with malice or in an attempt to ridicule us, I wouldn't have been upset. |
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Jul 9, 2009 17:00:28 GMT -5
I'm going to defend the Omega mittes post. Cause I posted it. It wasn't really to dis Omegas it was just funny. If he wasn't wearing nalia or threwing up the hooks I would have posted it on the general talk board. Plus his chest hair was growing in omega formation.
Do you all remember when the Crazy SGRho video was posted
alot of us thought it was hilarious - did the SGRhos? I mean it's happened to EVERY org |
|
|
|
Post by LogAKAlly <3'n Keef on Jul 9, 2009 17:03:10 GMT -5
HOLY shit!
What I miss?!?!?
Dammn 7 pages!! FUUCK!
|
|
|
|
Post by Bathroom Model on Jul 9, 2009 17:03:56 GMT -5
See that's not funny cause she clearly seems intoxicated or something?
But I would have laugh in yall face and cussed you out behind closed doors. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Jul 9, 2009 17:04:16 GMT -5
But that's just the thing. The approach is in the eye of the beholder. I thought "I Love You Ship" was hilarious. Alot of us did. But if the Kappas got pissed I could certainly understand it. The first time we talked about the Que with mitties - it was funny. The 2nd time it came up - it wasn't funny at all to me.
Conversely I thought Sheryl Underwood's election was interesting. But Fatal damn near got pistol whipped for mentioning something that was TOLD to her. It's like there's no rhyme or reason to it. If Bill Clinton and Al Sharpton became Masons could we comment on that or would we also have to wait for the Masons to approve it?
I get what everybody's position - but here's my main point. When the Que with the mitties was posted, it wasn't posted in any tactful way - it was posted in a hee hee ha ha way. I'm cool with Aces, he's good people - but seriously - this thread wasn't started anymore sideways than others that have come before it. I guess I see your point. But in defense, the Que with the mitties knew he was going to be clowned...he obviously wanted to be clowned. You can't get upset, he achieved his goal. I will speak for me. If the FOTWI information had been posted by a regular poster, I wouldn't have been upset. The situation is a learning opportunity for all of us, so as long as it wasn't done with malice or in an attempt to ridicule us, I wouldn't have been upset.
*SMITE* |
|
|
|
Post by THE emPRISS on Jul 9, 2009 17:04:02 GMT -5
I'm going to defend the Omega mittes post. Cause I posted it. It wasn't really to dis Omegas it was just funny. If he wasn't wearing nalia or threwing up the hooks I would have posted it on the general talk board. Plus his chest hair was growing in omega formation.
Do you all remember when the Crazy SGRho video was posted
alot of us thought it was hilarious - did the SGRhos? I mean it's happened to EVERY orgDames  I didnt get the joke in the vid  |
|
|
|
Post by Prissy New Year!!! on Jul 9, 2009 17:05:10 GMT -5
HOLY shit! What I miss?!?!? Dammn 7 pages!! FUUCK! We stopped talking about the Sigmas at around page 3. Right now there seems to be about 3 different conversations going on, it is really a free for all...come on in and join the fun. |
|
|
|
Post by DamieQue™ on Jul 9, 2009 17:06:08 GMT -5
See that's not funny cause she clearly seems intoxicated or something? But I would have laugh in yall face and cussed you out behind closed doors. LOL |
|
|
|
Post by THE emPRISS on Jul 9, 2009 17:05:52 GMT -5
I guess I see your point. But in defense, the Que with the mitties knew he was going to be clowned...he obviously wanted to be clowned. You can't get upset, he achieved his goal. I will speak for me. If the FOTWI information had been posted by a regular poster, I wouldn't have been upset. The situation is a learning opportunity for all of us, so as long as it wasn't done with malice or in an attempt to ridicule us, I wouldn't have been upset.
*SMITE* Im sure he thought that joint was owt.... I was embarrassed for yall....  |
|
I didnt get the joke in the vid 
