|
|
Post by FULLOFME on Apr 25, 2008 17:24:54 GMT -5
I think he's full of crap. He basically told you what went down if you read between the lines. Our cops F'ed up, we know it but won't convict them, sue us and we'll pay you for your trouble and try not to shoot another innocent black man next time....Oh yeah and please don't tear up our city we said we'd pay ya'll. :smh: lol @ Search's PR debunking... |
|
|
|
Post by Sapphire on Apr 26, 2008 15:03:44 GMT -5
I'm saddened by this decision, but not surprised. Look at all the other cops who have gotten off committing way over the top violence. I'm not a fan of shoot to kill... it seems to contradict protect and serve. I never understood why it isn't shoot to maim and secure or something like that. :shrugs: A tragedy all around.
|
|
|
|
Post by MochaD on Apr 28, 2008 12:29:25 GMT -5
Steve Harvey touched on this at his concert this weekend at Constitution Hall. He made an inklin' of a comparison to the Michael Vick case vs. the Sean Bell case. He basically was saying how, here we have Sean Bell, them cops got off for taking an UNARMED black man's life and they are free to go on about their business. However, Michael Vick killed some dogs due and his career/future is damn near to hell AND he got time. Basically to say that a black man's life is not even held equivalent to some dogs. Things that make you go hmmmm.....
|
|
